Bundestag

Multimodal Pathos Analysis in Political Speech: LLM-Based vs. Acoustic Emotion Models

Researchers compare acoustic speech emotion recognition (emotion2vec_plus_large), multimodal LLM analysis (Gemini 2.5 Flash), and a multi-agent LLM ensemble (TRUST pipeline) for detecting Pathos in a Bundestag political speech. Gemini Valence correlates strongly with TRUST-Pathos scores (rho=+0.664) while acoustic Valence does not (rho=+0.097), suggesting LLMs capture semantically defined political emotion far better than acoustic models. The study also critiques standard SER benchmark corpora (EMO-DB) for acted speech, cultural bias, and category incompatibility. Results indicate acoustic features remain useful for low-level arousal estimation but are insufficient proxies for rhetorical-emotional analysis.