Almanac
← Events
6arXiv cs.LG (Machine Learning)·2d ago

Open problem paper questions whether AdamW converges under heavy-tailed gradient noise

A preprint from arXiv frames as an open problem whether AdamW, the dominant optimizer for LLM pretraining, can achieve rigorous convergence guarantees under heavy-tailed stochastic gradient noise. The authors note that sign-based optimizers like Lion and Muon already have sharp heavy-tailed convergence rates, while AdamW's second-moment accumulator may create a fundamental obstruction by hiding large gradients. The paper proves a positive weighted-metric benchmark and introduces a corridor lower-bound mechanism to characterize the potential failure mode.

Related guides (2)

Related events (8)

8Openai Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

Estimating Worst-Case Frontier Risks of Open-Weight LLMs

OpenAI introduces a methodology called malicious fine-tuning (MFT) to assess worst-case risks of releasing open-weight models, specifically applied to their internal model gpt-oss. The study attempts to elicit maximum dangerous capabilities in biology and cybersecurity domains through targeted fine-tuning. This represents a systematic effort to quantify uplift risks before open-weight releases, informing OpenAI's open-weight release policy.

5arXiv · cs.LG·1mo ago·source ↗

Global Convergence Theory for Wasserstein Policy Gradient in Entropy-Regularized RL

This paper establishes the first global convergence theory for Wasserstein Policy Gradient (WPG), a continuous-control RL optimization method that uses optimal-transport geometry over action distributions. The authors show that the Bellman recursion structure of entropy-regularized RL induces a Polyak–Łojasiewicz (PL) geometry that substitutes for classical convexity, enabling global convergence analysis. Key technical contributions include a statewise KL representation of the soft Bellman residual, a Bellman resolvent identity linking value improvement to relative Fisher information, and a uniform log-Sobolev inequality for the evolving Gibbs policy family. The result yields geometric contraction up to discretization bias, providing theoretical grounding for WPG in continuous-action settings.

6arXiv · cs.LG·1mo ago·source ↗

Hamiltonian Probability Gradient Flow Analysis of the Muon Optimizer

This paper develops a rigorous theoretical framework for the Muon optimizer by interpreting its regularized orthogonalization map as the gradient of a Fenchel-dual smoothing of the nuclear norm, identifying Muon updates as mirror/prox steps with momentum as dual coordinates. The authors lift this structure to probability measures over matrix-valued parameters, deriving a mean-field phase-space equation that constitutes a damped Hamiltonian probability dynamics with monotonically decreasing Hamiltonian energy. Exponential convergence rates are established under gradient-dominance and curvature assumptions, and propagation-of-chaos guarantees are provided for the interacting particle system. The framework extends to transformer mixture-of-experts architectures via blockwise Muon probability flows.

5arXiv · cs.AI·16d ago·source ↗

AdamO optimizer and dynamical isometry regularization preserve plasticity in continual learning

A new arXiv preprint connects plasticity loss in continual learning to the empirical Neural Tangent Kernel and identifies dynamical isometry—keeping layer-wise Jacobian singular values near one—as a key mechanism for maintaining learning capacity under non-stationarity. The authors propose an isometry-promoting regularization scheme that can reactivate dormant ReLU units and introduce AdamO, an Adam-style optimizer that decouples isometry regularization from gradient updates analogously to AdamW. The methods are evaluated on supervised and reinforcement-learning continual-learning benchmarks, consistently matching or outperforming prior approaches. The work also reinterprets existing plasticity-preserving methods as targeting only partial isometry measures.

4arXiv · cs.LG·20d ago·source ↗

PC Layer: Polynomial weight preconditioning for stable LLM pre-training

Researchers propose a PC (preconditioning) layer that applies polynomial preconditioning to reshape the singular-value spectrum of weight matrices during LLM training, improving conditioning stability. The preconditioned weights merge back into the original architecture at inference time with no overhead. Experiments on Llama-1B pre-training show advantages over standard transformers for both AdamW and Muon optimizers, with theoretical convergence guarantees for deep linear networks.

6Openai Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

How AI Training Scales: Gradient Noise Scale Predicts Batch Parallelizability

OpenAI researchers report that the gradient noise scale — a statistical metric measuring gradient variance relative to mean — reliably predicts the optimal batch size and degree of parallelizability across a wide range of neural network training tasks. The finding suggests that more complex tasks with noisier gradients can benefit from increasingly large batch sizes, removing a potential ceiling on scaling. The work frames training dynamics as a systematic, measurable process rather than empirical art.

6arXiv · cs.CL·7d ago·source ↗

STARE: Token-level advantage reweighting to prevent entropy collapse in GRPO-style RL training

Researchers introduce STARE, a method addressing policy entropy collapse in GRPO-style reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) for LLM post-training. Through first-order gradient analysis, they identify a token-level credit assignment mismatch and propose selectively reweighting advantages for entropy-critical tokens using batch-internal surprisal quantiles plus a closed-loop entropy gate. Evaluated across 1.5B–32B models on short/long chain-of-thought and multi-turn tool use tasks, STARE outperforms DAPO and other baselines by 4–8% on AIME24/25 while sustaining stable training over thousands of steps.

5arXiv · cs.AI·17d ago·source ↗

Benchmarking study finds LLMs fail at counterintuitive probability problems despite strong standard performance

A new arXiv paper evaluates 8 state-of-the-art LLMs on discrete probability problems using two datasets: standard exercises (average accuracy 0.96) and counterintuitive exercises designed to trigger heuristic reasoning (average accuracy 0.59). The authors document token bias causing 20%+ performance drops when canonical problem formulations are disguised, and up to 34% degradation when misleading suggestions are embedded in prompts. The findings argue that current LLMs are not genuine probabilistic reasoners despite their success on advanced math benchmarks.