Almanac
← Events
5Hugging Face Blog·1mo ago

Kimina-Prover-RL: Reinforcement Learning for Formal Mathematical Proving

Hugging Face blog post introduces Kimina-Prover-RL, a model trained with reinforcement learning targeting formal mathematical theorem proving. The post appears to describe a system from the AI-MO (AI for Math Olympiad) initiative. This represents a development in applying RL to formal proof generation, a competitive area involving Lean/Mathlib-style verification environments.

Related guides (3)

Related events (8)

6Hugging Face Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

Kimina-Prover: Applying Test-time RL Search on Large Formal Reasoning Models

Kimina-Prover is a new large formal reasoning model that combines reinforcement learning with test-time search to improve mathematical theorem proving. The approach applies RL-trained search strategies at inference time, targeting formal proof generation in systems like Lean. The work is published via the AI-MO (AI for Math Olympiad) team on Hugging Face, continuing the trend of applying RL and extended compute at test time to hard reasoning tasks.

7Openai Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

OpenAI Neural Theorem Prover Solves Formal Math Olympiad Problems in Lean

OpenAI developed a neural theorem prover integrated with the Lean proof assistant that can solve challenging high-school olympiad problems, including problems from AMC12, AIME, and two IMO-adapted problems. The system demonstrates automated formal mathematical reasoning at a level previously requiring human expertise. This represents a significant capability milestone in AI-assisted formal verification and mathematical problem-solving.

5Openai Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Proving

OpenAI published research on applying generative language models to automated theorem proving, an early exploration of using neural language models to assist formal mathematical reasoning. The work investigates how language models can generate proof steps or complete proofs in formal systems. This represents an early milestone in AI-assisted mathematical reasoning, predating later work like GPT-f and subsequent theorem-proving systems.

6arXiv · cs.LG·4d ago·source ↗

ExpRL: RL-based mid-training using human QA data as reward scaffolds for LLM reasoning

ExpRL proposes an automated approach to LLM mid-training that replaces manually curated reasoning traces with large corpora of human-written QA data used as reward scaffolds rather than imitation targets. Reference solutions are hidden from the policy and used only to construct problem-specific grading rubrics, enabling dense process-level rewards that reinforce partial progress and intermediate reasoning steps. On challenging math reasoning benchmarks, ExpRL outperforms SFT, sparse-reward GRPO, and self-distillation as an RL initialization strategy, with additional mixed-domain experiments suggesting broader applicability.

6Qwen Research·1mo ago·source ↗

Qwen2.5-Math Process Reward Model for Mathematical Reasoning Supervision

Alibaba's Qwen team introduces a process reward model (PRM) aimed at improving the reliability of mathematical reasoning in LLMs by supervising intermediate reasoning steps rather than only final answers. The work addresses the problem of models producing plausible but flawed intermediate derivations even when reaching correct conclusions. The release includes model weights on HuggingFace and ModelScope alongside a GitHub repository.

7arXiv · cs.CL·17d ago·source ↗

PROVE framework trains LLMs for multi-step tool use via stateful MCP environments and programmatic rewards

Researchers introduce PROVE (Programmatic Rewards On Verified Environments), a framework for training LLMs to orchestrate multi-step tool calls using reinforcement learning. The system includes a library of 20 stateful MCP servers with 343 tools, an automated data synthesis pipeline that grounds training queries in live server state, and a multi-component programmatic reward function requiring no judge model. Training four models (Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-8B, Qwen2.5-7B, Granite-4.1-8B) with ~13K examples yields gains of up to +10.2 on BFCL Multi-Turn, +6.8 on tau2-bench, and +6.5 on T-Eval, demonstrating consistent improvements in multi-step tool orchestration.

3Openai Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

GamePad: A Learning Environment for Theorem Proving

OpenAI released GamePad, a learning environment designed to facilitate machine learning research on formal theorem proving. The tool provides an interface to the Coq proof assistant, enabling researchers to train models on proof states and tactics. This represents an early effort to apply ML techniques to automated mathematical reasoning and formal verification.

8arXiv · cs.AI·29d ago·source ↗

Large-Scale Evaluation of LLM-Driven Formal Proof Search on Open Mathematical Problems

Researchers present the first large-scale evaluation of LLM-based formal proof search on genuinely open mathematical problems, using Lean as a verification backend. Their most capable agent autonomously resolved 9 of 353 open Erdős problems and proved 44 of 492 OEIS conjectures, at a cost of a few hundred dollars per problem. The system is already being deployed in active research across combinatorics, optimization, graph theory, algebraic geometry, and quantum optics. The study also compares agent architectures, finding that more sophisticated designs outperform simple generate-and-verify loops on the hardest problems.