Almanac
← Events
7OpenAI Blog·1mo ago

OpenAI Abandons SWE-bench Verified Over Contamination and Measurement Flaws

OpenAI has announced it will no longer evaluate models on SWE-bench Verified, citing benchmark contamination and flawed test cases that cause it to mismeasure frontier coding capabilities. Their analysis identified both problematic test design and training data leakage as sources of unreliability. OpenAI recommends SWE-bench Pro as a replacement benchmark for evaluating coding progress.

Related guides (4)

Related events (8)

6Openai Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

Introducing SWE-bench Verified

OpenAI is releasing SWE-bench Verified, a human-validated subset of the SWE-bench benchmark designed to more reliably evaluate AI models on real-world software engineering tasks. The original SWE-bench contained issues that were ambiguous or unsolvable, leading to unreliable scores; the Verified subset addresses this by having human annotators confirm task solvability and clarity. This provides a cleaner signal for comparing coding agent performance across labs.

6The Batch·33h ago·source ↗

DeepSWE, ProgramBench, and ITBench-AA emerge as harder successors to SWE-bench for agent evaluation

Three new benchmarks — DeepSWE (by Datacurve), ProgramBench (Meta/Stanford/Harvard), and ITBench-AA (IBM/Artificial Analysis) — are positioned as more rigorous replacements for the SWE-bench family, which models have largely saturated. DeepSWE tests feature implementation using private codebases and human-written problems; ProgramBench evaluates agents' ability to recreate functional programs from scratch; ITBench-AA measures root-cause diagnosis in real-world IT incident scenarios. Current top performers include GPT-5.5 (70% on DeepSWE), Claude Opus 4.7 (46.7% on ITBench-AA), and Claude Opus 4.7 (3% on ProgramBench at the 95% pass threshold), illustrating that even frontier models have substantial headroom.

7arXiv · cs.CL·25d ago·source ↗

Automated Benchmark Auditing for AI Agents and Large Language Models (ABA)

The paper introduces Auto Benchmark Audit (ABA), an agentic framework that systematically audits AI benchmark tasks for issues such as ambiguous specifications, environment conflicts, and incorrect ground truths. Applied to 168 benchmarks across nine domains including NeurIPS publications, ABA identifies critical issues in over 25.7% of evaluated tasks. The authors demonstrate that filtering out flawed tasks materially shifts model rankings and improves average performance on SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2 by 9.9% and 9.6% respectively, indicating that current benchmark scores are significantly distorted by task quality problems. The agentic tool and annotations are released publicly.

6The Batch·23d ago·source ↗

Data Points: DeepSWE Benchmark, DeepSeek V4 Price Cuts, MAI-Image-2.5, Mythos Security Findings, MCP Stateless Update

This edition of The Batch covers five distinct AI developments: Datacurve's DeepSWE benchmark claims to fix critical grading flaws in SWE-bench Pro with hand-written verifiers and harder tasks; DeepSeek permanently cuts V4 Pro prices by 75%; Microsoft's MAI-Image-2.5 debuts third on the Arena leaderboard; Anthropic's Claude Mythos Preview found over 10,000 high/critical vulnerabilities in the first month of Project Glasswing, with remediation badly lagging discovery; and the Model Context Protocol proposes removing stateful sessions to enable stateless, load-balanced remote servers. Each item reflects meaningful movement in evaluation methodology, inference economics, multimodal generation, AI-assisted security, and agent tooling infrastructure.

6Openai Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

Introducing HealthBench

OpenAI has released HealthBench, a new evaluation benchmark designed to assess AI model performance and safety in healthcare settings. The benchmark was developed with input from over 250 physicians and targets realistic clinical scenarios. It aims to establish a shared standard for measuring how well AI models handle health-related tasks.

5Openai Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

OpenAI Expands External Safety Testing Ecosystem

OpenAI published a post describing its use of independent experts to evaluate frontier AI systems through third-party testing. The initiative aims to strengthen safety validation, verify safeguards, and increase transparency around capability and risk assessments. The announcement signals a continued push toward external accountability mechanisms for frontier model evaluation.

5arXiv · cs.CL·12d ago·source ↗

SWE-Explore: New benchmark isolates repository exploration capability in coding agents

SWE-Explore is a new benchmark targeting repository exploration as a distinct, fine-grained capability of coding agents, separate from end-to-end task resolution. It covers 848 issues across 10 programming languages and 203 open-source repositories, with line-level ground truth derived from successful agent trajectories. Evaluation across retrieval methods, coding agents, and specialized localizers finds that agentic explorers outperform classical retrieval, and that line-level coverage and efficient ranking remain the key differentiators at the frontier. The benchmark addresses a gap in SWE-bench-style evaluations that treat task resolution as a binary outcome.

5arXiv · cs.CL·9d ago·source ↗

Claw-SWE-Bench: A benchmark for evaluating agent harnesses on multilingual coding tasks

Researchers introduce Claw-SWE-Bench, a multilingual SWE-bench-style benchmark and adapter protocol designed to fairly compare heterogeneous agent harnesses ("claws") on GitHub issue-resolution tasks. The benchmark contains 350 instances across 8 languages and 43 repositories, with an 80-instance Lite subset for cost-efficient validation. Key findings show adapter design dominates raw model choice: a minimal adapter scores 19.1% Pass@1 versus 73.4% for a full adapter using the same GLM 5.1 backbone, and harness choice and model choice each shift Pass@1 by roughly 27-29 percentage points. The work also introduces cost accounting as a first-class evaluation axis alongside accuracy.