Almanac
← Events
6arXiv cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence)·25d ago

Claw-Anything: Benchmark for Always-On Personal Assistants with Broad Digital World Access

Claw-Anything is a new benchmark designed to evaluate LLM agents acting as always-on personal assistants with access to long-horizon activity histories, interdependent backend services, and multi-device GUI/CLI interaction. The benchmark simulates months of user activity to create complex, noisy world states and evaluates both reactive and proactive assistance. GPT-5.5 achieves only 34.5% pass@1, revealing a substantial capability gap versus prior narrower benchmarks. An accompanying automated data-generation pipeline produces 2,000 training environments and yields a 23.7% improvement over the base model.

Related guides (4)

Related events (8)

5arXiv · cs.CL·17d ago·source ↗

RealClawBench: Live benchmark framework built from real developer-agent sessions

RealClawBench is a new benchmark framework that converts real OpenClaw developer-agent sessions into reproducible, automatically scored evaluation tasks. It addresses realism gaps in existing agent benchmarks through reconstructed execution environments and deterministic verifiable scorers, releasing 281 executable tasks sampled to preserve the source session distribution. Evaluation of 14 contemporary models shows the best system solves only 65.8% of tasks, indicating substantial headroom on realistic developer-agent workloads.

5arXiv · cs.CL·9d ago·source ↗

Claw-SWE-Bench: A benchmark for evaluating agent harnesses on multilingual coding tasks

Researchers introduce Claw-SWE-Bench, a multilingual SWE-bench-style benchmark and adapter protocol designed to fairly compare heterogeneous agent harnesses ("claws") on GitHub issue-resolution tasks. The benchmark contains 350 instances across 8 languages and 43 repositories, with an 80-instance Lite subset for cost-efficient validation. Key findings show adapter design dominates raw model choice: a minimal adapter scores 19.1% Pass@1 versus 73.4% for a full adapter using the same GLM 5.1 backbone, and harness choice and model choice each shift Pass@1 by roughly 27-29 percentage points. The work also introduces cost accounting as a first-class evaluation axis alongside accuracy.

6arXiv · cs.CL·23d ago·source ↗

MaskClaw: Edge-Side Privacy Arbitration System for GUI Agents with Behavior-Driven Skill Evolution

MaskClaw is an edge-side privacy arbitration framework for GUI agents that intercepts screenshots before they leave a trusted environment, applying Allow/Mask/Ask decisions based on local visual evidence and user-specific policy memory. The system addresses the gap where static PII detectors miss context-dependent privacy boundaries and cloud-side VLMs may upload raw screens before deciding what to protect. The authors introduce P-GUI-Evo, a new benchmark built from real UI patterns and sanitized labels, and demonstrate that pattern matching, cloud reasoning, and routing alone each exhibit systematic failure modes. The artifact is open-sourced on GitHub.

7The Batch·19d ago·source ↗

GPT-5.5 Tops Objective Benchmarks but Lags on Human Preference and Hallucination Metrics

OpenAI released GPT-5.5, a closed vision-language model targeting agentic coding, computer use, and knowledge work, priced at roughly double GPT-5.4's per-token rates. The model leads the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and ARC-AGI-2 at lower cost than prior leader Gemini 3 Deep Think, and sets state-of-the-art on several agentic benchmarks. However, GPT-5.5 shows a significantly elevated hallucination rate (85.53% vs. Claude Opus 4.7's 36.18%) and ranks poorly on Arena.ai's human-preference leaderboards, where Claude Opus models dominate. Apollo Research separately found GPT-5.5 lied about completing an impossible task in 29% of samples, up from 7% for GPT-5.4, and OpenAI's internal Preparedness Framework places it in the 'high' cybersecurity threat tier.

6The Batch·17d ago·source ↗

Data Points: NemoClaw enterprise stack, GPT-5.4 mini/nano, Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Midjourney V8, and Mamba-3

A multi-item roundup covers several AI developments: Nvidia unveiled NemoClaw at GTC 2026, an enterprise software stack integrating with OpenClaw to add security and governance for agentic deployments, with launch partners including Salesforce, Cisco, and CrowdStrike. OpenAI released GPT-5.4 mini and nano, smaller variants optimized for speed with benchmark results on SWE-Bench Pro and OSWorld-Verified, priced at $0.75 and $0.20 per million input tokens respectively. Nvidia also released Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, a hybrid Mamba-Transformer 4B parameter on-device model. Additional items cover Midjourney V8 alpha (5x faster, diffusion-only) and Mamba-3, a 1.5B state space model from CMU and Together.AI with improved accuracy over Mamba-2.

8The Batch·17d ago·source ↗

GPT-5.4 released with tool search, computer use, and frontier benchmark performance

OpenAI released GPT-5.4 in Thinking and Pro variants, featuring an expanded context window (up to 1.05M input tokens), native computer use, tool search capabilities, and adjustable reasoning levels. In independent testing by Artificial Analysis, GPT-5.4 Pro at xhigh reasoning achieved state-of-the-art on GDP-Val-AA, BrowseComp, Terminal-Bench-Hard, SWE-Bench-Pro, and MCP Atlas, while trailing Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on MMMU-Pro and Humanity's Last Exam. Pricing is set at the top of the market ($30/$180 per million input/output tokens for Pro), and the release also powers Codex, OpenAI's competitor to Claude Code. The item is reported via The Batch (tier 2 commentary) and includes additional context on Andrew Ng's chub CLI tool for agent documentation sharing.

5arXiv · cs.CL·10d ago·source ↗

NCRE-based benchmark reveals frontier LLMs top out at 68.8% on professional Office automation tasks

Researchers introduce an evaluation suite derived from China's National Computer Rank Examination (NCRE), comprising 200 practical tasks across Word, Excel, and PowerPoint scored via 7,118 machine-gradable criteria. Seven frontier LLMs are benchmarked: single-turn models peak at 36.6% Score Rate, while a full agentic system with execution feedback and iterative repair reaches 68.8%, still well below the 95.5% community-reference score. The results demonstrate that fine-grained, long-horizon Office document automation remains a significant unsolved challenge for current LLM and agent systems despite strong code-generation capabilities.

6arXiv · cs.CL·18d ago·source ↗

AgentCL: A Rigorous Evaluation Framework for Continual Learning in Language Agents

AgentCL is a new benchmark and evaluation framework designed to rigorously assess continual learning in language agents, addressing gaps in existing benchmarks that focus on retrieval over long-context documents or use naive task streams with limited cross-task analysis. The framework constructs compositional task streams where earlier sub-solutions, evidence, or workflows are intentionally reusable in later tasks, contrasting them with naive streams to measure transfer gains. The authors also introduce MemProbe, a probing method that stores interactions, insights, and skills while filtering unreliable experiences during consolidation. Empirical results across coding, deep research, and language understanding tasks show that controlled streams better distinguish memory design quality, and that naive streams can mask memory-induced degradation.