Researchers introduce G-RRM (Guiding with Recurrent Reasoning Models), a neuro-symbolic framework that uses symbol-equivariant recurrent neural networks (SE-RRMs) to guide classical symbolic solvers—including backtracking and SAT solvers Glucose 4.1 and CaDiCaL 3.0.0—for constraint satisfaction problems. On 9×9 Sudoku, the approach achieves 33.3× speedup for backtracking and 1.70× for Glucose 4.1, but shows no significant gain for CaDiCaL due to its overhead-dominated runtime and inability to overwrite injected hints. The paper identifies two conditions for neural guidance to be effective: a large combinatorial search space and a solver architecture capable of dynamically overriding imperfect neural hints.
Researchers propose SD-GPS, a neuro-symbolic framework for geometry problem solving that treats a symbolic solver as an execution oracle during both formalization and deduction stages. The system combines solvability-guided reinforcement learning for autoformalization (built on QwenVL3-2B) with an impasse-aware agent that proposes and symbolically verifies auxiliary lemmas. Evaluations on Geometry3K and PGPS9K show SD-GPS outperforms existing multimodal, neural, and neuro-symbolic baselines across multiple task regimes. The work advances the line of research on grounding neural agents in formal systems for verifiable mathematical reasoning.
RiM introduces a latent reasoning method that replaces autoregressive chain-of-thought token generation with fixed sequences of special 'memory block' tokens, allowing LLMs to perform internal computation without externalizing intermediate steps. These memory blocks are processed in a single forward pass rather than generated autoregressively, improving compute efficiency at test time. Training uses a two-stage curriculum: first grounding memory blocks by predicting explicit reasoning steps, then discarding step-level supervision and refining answers iteratively. Experiments across multiple model families and sizes show RiM matches or exceeds existing latent reasoning methods.
This paper introduces Equilibrium Reasoners (EqR), a framework that formalizes test-time compute scaling through learned task-conditioned attractors in latent space, where stable fixed points correspond to valid solutions. EqR scales along two axes—depth (more iterations) and breadth (aggregating stochastic trajectories)—without requiring external verifiers or task-specific priors. On Sudoku-Extreme, unrolling up to 40,000 equivalent layers boosts accuracy from 2.6% (feedforward baseline) to over 99%. The work provides a mechanistic lens for understanding why iterative latent models generalize beyond memorized patterns.
OpenAI trained a model achieving state-of-the-art mathematical problem solving by rewarding each correct reasoning step (process supervision) rather than only the final answer (outcome supervision). This approach improves performance on math benchmarks and carries an alignment benefit by training models to produce human-endorsed chain-of-thought reasoning. The work highlights a potential synergy between capability improvements and alignment techniques.
Researchers propose Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RA-RFT), a post-training framework that trains a retriever to rank contexts by expected reasoning benefit rather than semantic similarity, then fine-tunes a policy model via reinforcement learning using retrieved analogous demonstrations. The key insight is that reasoning-relevant retrieval surfaces complementary solution strategies rather than superficially similar problems. On mathematical reasoning benchmarks, RA-RFT improves AIME 2025 average@32 accuracy by 7.1 and 2.8 points over GRPO for Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3-4B respectively, suggesting reasoning-aware retrieval is orthogonal to reward design and training curriculum improvements.
MemDreamer is a plug-and-play framework that decouples perception and reasoning for long-video understanding by incrementally building a three-tier Hierarchical Graph Memory capturing spatiotemporal and causal relations. During inference, a reasoning model uses an Observation-Reason-Action loop with agentic tool-augmented retrieval to navigate the memory graph, constraining the context window to 2% of full-context ingestion while achieving a 12.5-point absolute accuracy gain. The system reaches SOTA on four benchmarks, narrowing the gap with human experts to 3.7 points. The authors also report a strong linear correlation between logical reasoning performance and long-video understanding, proposing agentic capability scaling as a new paradigm for multimodal comprehension.
Researchers propose AIR, a system that trains multimodal large language models to adaptively interleave reasoning with code execution for numerical computation tasks, going beyond prior work that focused only on visual operations. The approach combines a two-stage cold-start data pipeline, RL dataset filtering, and a group-constrained reward function for tool-invocation decisions. Experiments show a 6.1 percentage point average improvement on evaluation benchmarks, with interleaved reasoning samples gaining 9.9 pp and tool-use success exceeding 95%.
Researchers introduce MAST (Mechanism-Aligned Selective Targeting), a method for selectively unlearning capabilities induced by reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) in language models while minimizing collateral damage to retained knowledge. The approach ranks attention-projection tensors by off-principal energy and gradient coupling to identify a targeted subset for update, rather than applying full-parameter gradient ascent. Evaluated on Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B and Qwen3-1.7B-Base, MAST achieves statistically significant forgetting on target MATH problems while preserving GSM8K performance, whereas full-parameter unlearning collapses retained capabilities. The method generalizes across seeds and unlearning objectives (NPO/SimNPO).