BayesPO reframes prompt optimization as Bayesian posterior sampling over discrete prompt tokens, combining a task likelihood term with a language-model prior to form an energy-based objective. The framework uses a Metropolis-Hastings corrected Gibbs-with-Langevin proposal with parallel tempering to explore rugged LLM energy landscapes without updating model weights. Experiments on Qwen2.5 models show modest accuracy gains on instruction-induction tasks (60.04% to 63.23%), with identified limitations around overfitting and computational cost. The work positions principled probabilistic methods as an alternative to heuristic prompt search procedures.
A new arXiv preprint introduces MAS-PromptBench, a benchmark and study examining when and how much system-prompt optimization improves multi-agent LLM systems (MAS). The authors evaluate two prompt optimizers across diverse MAS configurations varying in task, workflow, communication protocol, and team size. Results show prompt optimization can unlock significant gains but also expose open challenges, particularly around the exponentially growing search space as agent count increases.
Researchers introduce Zone of Proximal Policy Optimization (ZPPO), a training method inspired by Vygotsky's zone of proximal development that embeds teacher guidance in prompts rather than policy gradients or logit imitation. On hard questions where student rollouts fail, ZPPO constructs Binary Candidate-included Questions (BCQ) and Negative Candidate-included Questions (NCQ) to help the student discriminate correct from incorrect responses, with a replay buffer that recirculates hard questions until mastered. Evaluated on the Qwen3 family (0.8B–9B) with a 27B teacher across a 31-benchmark suite covering VLM, LLM, and video tasks, ZPPO outperforms both distillation and GRPO baselines, with the largest gains at the smallest model scale. The method addresses a known failure mode of RL training where zero-reward rollouts produce no gradient signal.
DrPO is a new online preference fine-tuning method designed specifically for deterministic one-step text-to-image generators like SD-Turbo and SDXL-Turbo, which are difficult to align with standard RLHF methods that require policy likelihoods or differentiable reward gradients. The method samples candidates per prompt, ranks them with a target reward, and synthesizes a feature-space update direction via a non-parametric dipole preference field plus a reference drift from the frozen base model. Because the reward is used only for ranking, DrPO supports black-box and non-differentiable reward functions while keeping inference as a single forward pass. Evaluations on HPSv3 and GenEval show improved alignment over reward-gradient-free baselines and a 3.51× reduction in training compute by eliminating reward-model backpropagation.
A new arXiv preprint models user-LLM interaction as a bilevel cheap-talk game and derives PAC-Bayes bounds showing two irreducible limitations: an 'expressivity floor' where language's finite channel capacity makes distinct tasks indistinguishable, and an 'objective-misalignment floor' where alignment constraints prevent reaching user-ideal outputs. The authors prove that prompt-conditioned LLMs cannot be universal problem solvers, as correct behavior on certain task families is provably unattainable even with infinite data, optimal training, or model scaling. The work suggests multimodal inputs and external memory as potential mitigations by increasing task-relevant information bandwidth.
Researchers from Carnegie Mellon University introduced Privileged On-Policy Exploration (POPE), a training method that pairs GRPO reinforcement learning with hint-augmented datasets to help LLMs solve hard problems they would otherwise fail to explore. During training, the model receives partial solution prefixes alongside full problems, enabling it to discover complete solutions; it is then trained on both hinted and unhinted versions so it learns to solve problems without hints at inference time. On competition math benchmarks AIME 2025 and HMMT 2025, POPE outperforms standard GRPO and supervised fine-tuning, with HMMT pass@1 improving from 31.0% to 37.8%. The method addresses a core bottleneck in RL training—sparse reward exploration—by decomposing hard problem-solving into finding a good starting state and completing the solution.
GraphPO is a new reinforcement learning framework that represents reasoning rollouts as directed acyclic graphs rather than independent chains or trees, merging semantically equivalent reasoning paths into equivalence classes to share suffixes and reduce redundant exploration. The approach assigns efficiency advantages to incoming edges and correctness advantages to outgoing edges, deriving process supervision from outcome rewards. Experiments on three LLMs across reasoning and agentic search benchmarks show consistent improvements over chain- and tree-based baselines under equal token or response budgets. The method also provides theoretical guarantees on reduced advantage-estimation variance.
PIPO is a new inference efficiency framework that unifies input-side latent compression with output-side multi-token prediction (MTP) by treating them as mirror operations: a compressor folds two input tokens into one latent, while an MTP head unfolds one hidden state into an additional output token. To avoid the expensive verifier pass typically required by speculative decoding, PIPO trains a lightweight confidence head using On-Policy Distillation (OPD), which naturally aligns with rejection-sampling criteria. Experiments on Qwen3.5-4B and 9B backbones across AIME 2025, GPQA-Diamond, LiveCodeBench v6, and LongBench v2 show up to 2.64× first-token-latency speedup and +7.15 pass@4 improvement over regular decoding.
This paper identifies a structural asymmetry in agentic reasoning called the 'Thinking-Acting Gap,' where tool use is attempted in only ~30% of rollouts under standard RL training (GRPO), and all-wrong tool-using subgroups suppress learning signals. The authors propose AXPO (Agent eXplorative Policy Optimization), which fixes the thinking prefix and resamples tool calls for all-wrong subgroups, combined with uncertainty-based prefix selection. Evaluated across nine multimodal benchmarks on Qwen3-VL-Thinking at multiple scales, SFT+AXPO outperforms SFT+GRPO by +1.8pp on both Pass@1 and Pass@4 at 8B, with the 8B model surpassing the 32B baseline on Pass@4 using 4× fewer parameters.