bridge-evidence-static-retrieval-utility-does-not-predict-causal-utility-in-multi-step-agentic-search-9efaed7c·1 events·first seen Aliases: Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search
A new arXiv paper demonstrates empirically that static retrieval relevance scores are nearly statistically independent from causal utility in multi-step agentic search (Spearman rho = -0.026 across 23,322 document observations). Using a ReAct-style agent over HotpotQA with counterfactual trajectory replays, the authors show that roughly a third of documents are causally load-bearing ('bridge documents') while appearing useless to a static reader. The mechanism is identified: bridge documents supply discriminative entities that redirect subsequent queries, meaning optimizing static RAG utility does not deliver agentic utility.