
musique-3e68c393·7 events·first seen Aliases: MuSiQue
A new arXiv preprint proposes two adapter families — MaLoRA (token-level dynamic scaling via Mamba recurrence) and MaRA (context-level segment retrieval via cross-segment state tracking) — as improvements over standard LoRA for language model reasoning. Evaluated on three frozen backbones (Qwen-2.5-7B, Llama-3.1-8B, Gemma-2-9B) and two multi-hop QA benchmarks (MuSiQue, 2WikiMultihopQA), the methods yield average gains of +6.8 F1 (+10.5% relative) over LoRA, with up to +18.2% relative improvement on the hardest configuration. Token-level gains also transfer to RULER QA-2 under length-stress conditions.
DynaKRAG is a new framework that formulates multi-hop retrieval-augmented generation as a state-conditioned control problem over atomic evidence operations (iterative retrieval, query reformulation, sufficiency judging, etc.), using a learned controller to select among valid operations at each step. Evaluated with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, it achieves F1 scores of 0.5998 on HotpotQA, 0.5340 on 2WikiMultiHopQA, and 0.3061 on MuSiQue, outperforming the strongest baselines on all three benchmarks. Ablations show that replacing the learned controller with a uniform policy costs 3.96–5.78 F1 points, and that additional retrieval is not uniformly beneficial.
A new arXiv preprint introduces Logit-Contribution Scoring (LOCOS), a method for identifying attention heads responsible for non-literal retrieval in long-context LLMs — cases where models synthesize answers from meaning rather than copying tokens verbatim. Existing detectors fail at this task because they rely on a literal-copy criterion that misses the output-value (OV) circuit mechanism. Evaluated across Qwen3, Gemma-3, and OLMo-3.1, LOCOS outperforms prior attention-based detectors on the NoLiMa benchmark, with ablation of 50 heads on Qwen3-8B collapsing ROUGE-L from 0.401 to 0.000 while the best baseline retains 0.292. The identified heads are retrieval-specific, leaving parametric recall and arithmetic reasoning unaffected.
A new arXiv preprint tests the implicit assumption that LLM evaluation is easier than generation, using a controlled in-context QA setup across four benchmarks (SQuAD 2.0, DROP, HotpotQA, MuSiQue) and two models. Results show generation accuracy exceeds self-evaluation accuracy on three of four benchmarks, with attention analysis revealing that evaluation attends to context 3–5x less than generation does. LoRA fine-tuning experiments confirm the asymmetry is not a training artifact, with cross-task interference observed in both directions. The findings directly challenge assumptions underlying LLM-as-a-Judge and self-evaluation pipelines widely used in RLHF and agentic systems.
Researchers introduce operadic consistency (OC), a label-free inference-time signal that checks whether an LLM's direct answer to a compositional query agrees with the answer produced by composing its own stated decomposition of that query. Evaluated across 12 instruction-tuned LLMs (4B–671B parameters) on four multi-hop QA datasets, OC achieves Pearson r ∈ [0.86, 0.94] with accuracy uniformly across all datasets, outperforming self-consistency, semantic entropy, and P(True) in cross-dataset robustness. At the per-question level, OC provides information beyond existing baselines and yields selective-prediction improvements (AUARC lifts +0.086–0.096, AUROC lifts +0.092–0.164) at equal sampling cost, with results extending to frontier thinking models using chain-of-thought decompositions.
A new arXiv preprint introduces HKVM-RAG, an evidence-organization layer for multi-hop RAG that uses weighted hyperedges as retrieval keys while retaining passage text as answer values. Under a fixed-substrate protocol controlling for tuple cache, reader, and evaluation budget, the hypergraph key-value approach improves over KG-PPR by +3.4 F1 on 2WikiMultiHopQA and +3.6 F1 on MuSiQue. A dense-aware controller combining frozen ColBERTv2 with HKVM features reaches 88.8, 65.1, and 85.8 F1 on three benchmarks, outperforming ColBERTv2 alone by 5–11 F1 points. The work positions hypergraph organization as a reusable evidence-control mechanism rather than a dense-retrieval replacement.
BRANE is a system that dynamically selects retrieval agent pipeline configurations (LLM, retriever, number of hops, synthesis strategy) at inference time based on per-query characteristics and a cost-quality target. It uses an LLM to extract workload features from each query, then applies lightweight per-configuration predictors to estimate correctness, selecting the configuration that maximizes predicted accuracy penalized by cost. Evaluated on MuSiQue, BrowseComp-Plus, and FinanceBench, BRANE matches best-fixed-configuration accuracy at up to 89% lower cost and outperforms LLM-routing and fine-tuned Qwen3-4B baselines. The work frames per-query pipeline configuration as a practical alternative to static workload-level tuning.