Almanac
← Events
5arXiv cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence)·1mo ago

Ensembling Tabular Foundation Models: A Diversity Ceiling and a Calibration Trap

This paper benchmarks six ensemble strategies across six tabular foundation models (TFMs) on 153 OpenML classification tasks, finding that ensembling provides minimal gains over the best single TFM. The best ensemble strategy (two-level cascade stacking) achieves only +0.18% accuracy improvement at 253× the compute cost. A key finding is that logistic-regression meta-learner stacking improves accuracy while severely degrading calibration (log-loss), because sharpening class boundaries destroys probability estimates. The authors recommend greedy ensemble selection as the practical default.

Related guides (2)

Related events (8)

5arXiv · cs.AI·1mo ago·source ↗

Distilling Tabular Foundation Models for Structured Health Data

This paper investigates knowledge distillation from tabular foundation models (TFMs) to lightweight student models for healthcare applications. The authors address context leakage in in-context TFMs via stratified out-of-fold teacher labeling, evaluating across 19 healthcare datasets, 6 TFM teachers, and 4 student families. Distilled students retain at least 90% of teacher AUC while running 26× faster on CPU, with preserved calibration and fairness properties. Multi-teacher ensembles do not consistently outperform the best single teacher.

4Hugging Face Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

Investing in Performance: Fine-tune small models with LLM insights — a CFM case study

This Hugging Face blog post presents a case study from CFM (Capital Fund Management) on using large language model outputs to guide fine-tuning of smaller, more efficient models for financial applications. The approach leverages LLM-generated signals or labels to train compact models that can be deployed at lower cost and latency. The case study illustrates an enterprise pattern of distilling LLM capabilities into task-specific smaller models for production use.

6arXiv · cs.CL·29d ago·source ↗

Hyperfitting Explained: Terminal Geometric Expansion in Final Transformer Layers Drives Diversity Gains

This paper investigates the 'hyperfitting' phenomenon—where fine-tuning LLMs to near-zero loss on small datasets improves open-ended generation and reduces repetition—and demonstrates it is mechanistically distinct from temperature scaling. Entropy-matched control experiments falsify both the temperature-equivalence and static vocabulary reweighting hypotheses, instead localizing the effect to a 'Terminal Expansion' in the final transformer block where feature-space dimensionality expands by ~80.8 dimensions, enabling promotion of deep-tail tokens via context-dependent rank reordering. The authors introduce Late-Stage LoRA, a targeted fine-tuning strategy updating only the final 5 layers, achieving robust generation with minimal parameter updates.

7arXiv · cs.LG·26d ago·source ↗

Complete-muE: Optimal Hyperparameter Transfer and Scaling for MoE Models

Complete-muE is a framework for transferring hyperparameters across dense FFN and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) transformer architectures, addressing limitations of existing tools like μP and SDE that cannot handle simultaneous architecture and token-per-expert changes. It uses a two-bridge system: Bridge I maps dense FFN to Dense MoE via active-width μP with normalized router scale, and Bridge II maps Dense MoE to sparse MoE via activated-expert scaling with a first-order SDE correction. The practical outcome is a 'tune dense once, transfer to all' recipe that enables near-optimal hyperparameter reuse across MoE configurations without costly re-tuning. Experiments on language model and diffusion model pretraining confirm stable hyperparameter optima across architectures and parameter counts.

6arXiv · cs.AI·22d ago·source ↗

Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM Training

This Microsoft Research paper systematically investigates how data organization—distinct from data selection—affects LLM training efficiency across pre-training and SFT stages. The authors formalize four guidelines (Boundary Sharpening, Cyclic Scheduling, Curriculum Continuity, and Local Diversity) and introduce two novel data ordering methods, STR and SAW, that reuse pre-computed sample-level scores with minimal additional overhead. Experiments across multiple model scales and dataset sizes demonstrate improved training stability and performance, with code released publicly.

7arXiv · cs.AI·1mo ago·source ↗

Toto 2.0: Open-Weights Time Series Foundation Models Demonstrate Scaling Laws from 4M to 2.5B Parameters

Datadog releases Toto 2.0, a family of five open-weights time series forecasting models ranging from 4M to 2.5B parameters, demonstrating consistent forecast quality improvements with scale. The models achieve state-of-the-art results on three benchmarks: BOOM (observability), GIFT-Eval (general-purpose), and TIME (contamination-resistant). The release includes architectural details, a u-muP hyperparameter transfer pipeline, and all base checkpoints under Apache 2.0 license.

5arXiv · cs.LG·19d ago·source ↗

TxFM: Masked Autoencoding Foundation Model for RNA-seq Gene Expression Representation

The paper introduces TxFM, a self-supervised masked autoencoder model for transcriptomic (RNA-seq) data representation learning, trained on a curated 1.4M-sample corpus called DiverseRNA-1.4M. TxFM outperforms existing transcriptomic foundation models trained on datasets over 100x larger, addressing the known problem of deep models underperforming linear baselines on gene expression data. The work provides ablation studies identifying critical architecture choices and argues that careful data curation combined with inductive self-supervised learning is sufficient for strong transfer performance in transcriptomics.

4arXiv · cs.AI·5d ago·source ↗

Benchmark of deep learning architectures for multi-horizon behavioural forecasting in mobile health

A new arXiv preprint benchmarks six deep learning architectures, two zero-shot foundation models, and statistical baselines on multi-horizon behavioural forecasting from wearable and smartphone data across 800+ participants. Key findings include: no single architecture dominates (PatchTST leads among trained models), TimesFM matches or exceeds trained models zero-shot especially in low-data regimes, and participant-level fine-tuning reduces per-feature RMSE by 16–60%. The study is the first to jointly evaluate modern deep learning, foundation models, and personalisation for this domain.