Almanac
← Events
4arXiv cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence)·5d ago

Benchmark of deep learning architectures for multi-horizon behavioural forecasting in mobile health

A new arXiv preprint benchmarks six deep learning architectures, two zero-shot foundation models, and statistical baselines on multi-horizon behavioural forecasting from wearable and smartphone data across 800+ participants. Key findings include: no single architecture dominates (PatchTST leads among trained models), TimesFM matches or exceeds trained models zero-shot especially in low-data regimes, and participant-level fine-tuning reduces per-feature RMSE by 16–60%. The study is the first to jointly evaluate modern deep learning, foundation models, and personalisation for this domain.

Related guides (1)

Related events (8)

7arXiv · cs.AI·29d ago·source ↗

Foundation Model for Wearable Health Data Pretrained on 1 Trillion Minutes from 5 Million Participants

Researchers propose a large-scale foundation model for wearable health data, pretrained on over one trillion minutes of unlabeled sensor signals from five million participants. The model demonstrates systematic performance improvements across 35 health prediction tasks spanning cardiovascular, metabolic, sleep, and mental health domains, with joint scaling of model capacity and data volume. A 'classroom' of LLM agents autonomously searches downstream predictive head configurations, and the resulting embeddings are integrated into a Personal Health Agent validated by 1,860 clinician ratings. The work establishes label-efficient few-shot learning and generative capabilities for daily health metric estimation.

5Hugging Face Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

Back to The Future: Evaluating AI Agents on Predicting Future Events

This Hugging Face blog post introduces FutureBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on their ability to predict future events, addressing the challenge of data contamination in standard benchmarks by using temporally forward-looking tasks. The approach tests whether agents can reason about and forecast outcomes beyond their training data cutoff. This framing positions future-event prediction as a rigorous, contamination-resistant evaluation methodology for frontier models and agents.

3arXiv · cs.LG·11d ago·source ↗

Zero Touch Predictive Orchestration: Automated Time-Series Forecasting for Cloud-Edge Continuum Cold Start

A preprint proposes a fully automated time-series prediction architecture for Cloud-Edge Continuum (CEC) orchestration, addressing the cold-start problem where newly discovered edge nodes lack historical data for localized model training. The system combines a lightweight Resource Exposer for telemetry collection with a novel data-mixing methodology that merges sparse local samples with TimeTrack, a publicly released high-resolution dataset, then feeds the result through a Neural Architecture Search engine to auto-generate baseline models. Experiments show the approach improves MSE, MAE, and MAPE and accelerates convergence versus training on local data alone or generic datasets.

7arXiv · cs.AI·1mo ago·source ↗

DeepWeb-Bench: A Hard Deep Research Benchmark Requiring Cross-Source Evidence and Long-Horizon Derivation

DeepWeb-Bench is a new benchmark designed to stress-test frontier language models on deep research tasks—open-web search, evidence collection, and multi-step derivation—where existing benchmarks have become saturated. The benchmark evaluates nine frontier models across four capability families (Retrieval, Derivation, Reasoning, Calibration) and finds that retrieval is not the primary bottleneck; derivation and calibration failures account for over 70% of errors. Strong models fail via incomplete derivation while weak models fail via hallucinated precision, and models show genuine domain specialization with low cross-model agreement (rho = 0.61). The benchmark, rubrics, and evaluation code are publicly released.

4arXiv · cs.CL·9d ago·source ↗

Zero-shot LLMs fail to beat baselines on stock prediction; explainability signals retain practical value

A new arXiv preprint evaluates zero-shot NLP pipelines for predicting short-term stock movements from financial news, finding that across multiple models and prediction horizons, zero-shot approaches consistently fail to outperform simple baselines, with especially weak performance on negative price movements. The authors introduce a multi-layered explainability framework linking predictions to token-, article-, and aggregate-level evidence, finding that explainability signals can reliably distinguish trustworthy from unreliable predictions even when accuracy is low. The work argues for a shift toward decision-support systems emphasizing transparency and uncertainty awareness rather than raw predictive accuracy.

6arXiv · cs.CL·11d ago·source ↗

iOSWorld: Benchmark for Personalized iOS Phone Agents with Persistent User Identity

Researchers introduce iOSWorld, the first interactive native iOS simulator benchmark designed to evaluate phone agents on personalized, identity-aware tasks across 26 custom-built iOS apps. The benchmark includes 133 tasks spanning single-app, multi-app, and memory/personalization categories, with connected personal data such as transactions, messages, and social relationships. Frontier models reach only 52% overall and 37% on multi-app tasks; privileged vision+XML access improves frontier models by up to 26 percentage points but does not help smaller models. The benchmark is released open-source with all apps, data, tasks, and evaluation code.

5arXiv · cs.AI·1mo ago·source ↗

Distilling Tabular Foundation Models for Structured Health Data

This paper investigates knowledge distillation from tabular foundation models (TFMs) to lightweight student models for healthcare applications. The authors address context leakage in in-context TFMs via stratified out-of-fold teacher labeling, evaluating across 19 healthcare datasets, 6 TFM teachers, and 4 student families. Distilled students retain at least 90% of teacher AUC while running 26× faster on CPU, with preserved calibration and fairness properties. Multi-teacher ensembles do not consistently outperform the best single teacher.

7arXiv · cs.AI·1mo ago·source ↗

Toto 2.0: Open-Weights Time Series Foundation Models Demonstrate Scaling Laws from 4M to 2.5B Parameters

Datadog releases Toto 2.0, a family of five open-weights time series forecasting models ranging from 4M to 2.5B parameters, demonstrating consistent forecast quality improvements with scale. The models achieve state-of-the-art results on three benchmarks: BOOM (observability), GIFT-Eval (general-purpose), and TIME (contamination-resistant). The release includes architectural details, a u-muP hyperparameter transfer pipeline, and all base checkpoints under Apache 2.0 license.