Real Images, Worse Judgments: Evaluating VLMs on Concreteness and Imagery
This paper evaluates whether vision-language models (VLMs) benefit from real image context when making lexical judgments about word concreteness and imagery. The authors find that real-image contexts frequently hurt alignment with human ratings, especially when visual evidence is least relevant to the word being judged. Probing and canonical correlation analysis reveal that real images cause representational shifts and increased sensitivity to spurious visual cues. Instructing models to focus on text-only content at inference time partially mitigates this degradation.
Related guides (3)
Related events (8)
VLMs May Not Globally Enhance Human Alignment over LLMs During Natural Reading
This paper compares matched LLM and VLM pairs in a text-only setting to isolate the effect of multimodal training history on human-like language processing. Using whole-cortex fMRI and eye-tracking data from natural reading, the authors find that multimodal pretraining does not confer a uniform global advantage in human alignment. However, VLMs show selective advantages when sentences contain stronger visual semantic content, with converging evidence from both neural and behavioral measures. The findings suggest language-internal representations remain the primary driver of human text processing alignment.
LoMo: Local Modality Substitution for Deeper Vision-Language Fusion
This paper identifies a 'carrier sensitivity' problem in Vision-Language Models (VLMs), where replacing textual queries with rendered-image equivalents causes significant performance degradation due to asymmetric roles of text and images in training data. The authors propose Local Modality Substitution (LoMo), a data curation paradigm that reformulates single-modality prompts into interleaved multimodal sequences by dynamically rendering text spans as images, enforcing cross-modal representational invariance. Evaluated across 13 multimodal benchmarks, LoMo improves over standard supervised fine-tuning by 2.67 points on LLaVA-OneVision-1.5-8B and 2.82 points on Qwen3.5-9B. The approach is architecture-agnostic and lightweight, requiring no changes to model architecture.
Vision-Language Models Suppress Female Representations Under Ambiguous Input
This paper investigates gender bias in vision-language models (VLMs) when inputs are ambiguous (e.g., workers in full gear or seen from behind), finding that models default to male outputs even for strongly female-stereotyped occupations. The authors introduce LALS (Latent Association Leaning Score), a zero-shot metric that probes internal visual-token activations to measure concept associations across layers. Across 15 occupations, 800+ ambiguous images, and four VLMs, they find a systematic decoupling: models internally encode female associations but suppress them before generation, with male signals amplifying end-to-end while female signals peak mid-network and are filtered out. Cultural visual cues like clothing color further modulate these internal associations.
Vision Language Models Explained
A Hugging Face blog post providing a technical overview of vision language models (VLMs), covering their architecture, training approaches, and capabilities. The post serves as an educational resource explaining how VLMs combine visual and language understanding. As a tier-2 commentary piece, it synthesizes existing knowledge rather than presenting new research findings.
Vision Language Models (Better, faster, stronger)
A Hugging Face blog post surveys the state of vision-language models (VLMs) in 2025, covering advances in architecture, training, efficiency, and deployment. The post reviews progress across major open and closed VLMs, highlighting trends in multimodal capability, speed improvements, and practical deployment patterns. As a tier-2 commentary piece, it synthesizes the current landscape rather than announcing new research.
Mitigating Perceptual Judgment Bias in Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge via Perceptual Perturbation and Reward Modeling
This paper identifies and analyzes 'Perceptual Judgment Bias' in multimodal LLM judges, where models anchor on response text rather than visual evidence when the two conflict. The authors introduce a Perceptually Perturbed Judgment Dataset using counterfactual responses to isolate perceptual errors, and a training framework combining GRPO-based reward modeling with batch-ranking objectives. Experiments on MLLM-as-a-Judge benchmarks show improved perceptual fidelity, ranking coherence, and alignment with human evaluation.
A Dive into Vision-Language Models
This Hugging Face blog post provides a technical overview of vision-language model (VLM) pretraining approaches, covering architectures and training strategies used to align visual and textual representations. It surveys key models and techniques in the multimodal learning space as of early 2023. The post serves as an educational reference for practitioners working with or building VLMs.
Imaginative Perception Tokens improve spatial reasoning in vision-language models
Researchers introduce Imaginative Perception Tokens (IPT), intermediate perceptual representations that externalize what a VLM would perceive from alternative spatial viewpoints, enabling reasoning about unobserved spatial structure. The approach is evaluated on three new tasks—Perspective Taking, Path Tracing, and Multiview Counting—using ~20K examples built on the BAGEL backbone. IPT supervision consistently outperforms textual chain-of-thought training for spatial tasks, with the authors finding that forcing spatial computation through language can degrade performance, suggesting a modality mismatch. The work provides both a practical supervision technique and a diagnostic finding about the limits of language-mediated spatial reasoning.