Almanac
← Events
4arXiv cs.CL (Computation and Language)·17d ago

Synthetic linguistic reasoning traces improve low-resource machine translation via in-context learning

Researchers propose a pipeline that generates step-by-step linguistic reasoning traces from Universal Dependencies treebanks, dictionaries, and grammar-rule banks to assist LLMs in translating extremely low-resource languages. Evaluated on Xibe and Chintang across ICL, SFT, and RFT settings, the traces prove most effective as inference-time guidance rather than training data. Models can leverage reliable grammatical analyses at inference time but struggle to learn to generate accurate traces themselves, identifying trace generation quality as the key bottleneck.

Related guides (1)

Related events (8)

5arXiv · cs.CL·15d ago·source ↗

Reinforcement learning enables meta-skill for translating unseen low-resource languages via in-context linguistic knowledge

Researchers propose an RL-based training approach for translating extremely low-resource or unseen languages by rewarding models for extracting and applying in-context linguistic knowledge (e.g., grammar books) rather than memorizing specific languages. Using chrF as a surface-level reward signal, RL-trained models outperform both in-context learning and supervised fine-tuning on completely unseen languages at test time. The work extends outcome-based RL beyond math and coding reasoning tasks, suggesting broader applicability to language learning from context.

6arXiv · cs.CL·18d ago·source ↗

Luar: Selective Translation via Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Reasoning

Luar is a reinforcement learning framework that trains reasoning language models to selectively invoke English translation only when direct understanding of a non-English input is deemed unreliable. The approach, built on top of GRPO, outperforms standard multilingual baselines across reasoning benchmarks, with especially large gains on low-resource languages. Analysis confirms the model learns to avoid unnecessary translation when direct reasoning suffices, and generalizes the translation-call behavior to unseen low-resource languages.

5arXiv · cs.CL·17d ago·source ↗

Synthetic LLM-generated conversations improve ASR training for low-resource languages

Researchers propose a pipeline that uses LLMs to generate scenario-level dialogues and TTS to synthesize multi-speaker audio, creating simulated conversational training data for ASR systems. Evaluated on the Hungarian BEA-Dialogue benchmark, a model trained on 67 hours of real plus 636 hours of synthetic data outperforms a zero-shot model trained on 2,700 hours of real Hungarian speech. The study tests five LLM families under multiple budget and mixing configurations using a FastConformer-Large backbone, finding that generator choice and data composition significantly affect gains.

6arXiv · cs.LG·4d ago·source ↗

ExpRL: RL-based mid-training using human QA data as reward scaffolds for LLM reasoning

ExpRL proposes an automated approach to LLM mid-training that replaces manually curated reasoning traces with large corpora of human-written QA data used as reward scaffolds rather than imitation targets. Reference solutions are hidden from the policy and used only to construct problem-specific grading rubrics, enabling dense process-level rewards that reinforce partial progress and intermediate reasoning steps. On challenging math reasoning benchmarks, ExpRL outperforms SFT, sparse-reward GRPO, and self-distillation as an RL initialization strategy, with additional mixed-domain experiments suggesting broader applicability.

6arXiv · cs.CL·1mo ago·source ↗

Tracing the Emergence of Human-Like Pragmatic Reasoning in LLMs Across Languages

Researchers conducted a population-matching experiment evaluating 25 LLMs on conditional inference tasks across four languages, comparing model behavior to matched human populations. The study finds that LLMs function as accurate semantic operators but systematically fail to capture pragmatic enrichments—context-sensitive inferences beyond literal logical meaning—that humans apply effortlessly. Model performance on pragmatic reasoning is not predicted by open vs. closed weights, training orientation, or architecture type, suggesting pragmatic reasoning remains an emergent and unreliable capability. The findings contribute to ongoing debates about whether LLMs reason like humans or merely approximate surface-level linguistic patterns.

6arXiv · cs.CL·29d ago·source ↗

LANG: Reinforcement Learning Framework for Multilingual Reasoning with Language-Adaptive Hint Guidance

LANG is a new RL-based framework for improving multilingual reasoning in LLMs that addresses the trade-off between input-language consistency and reasoning quality. It uses language-conditioned hints with a progressive decay schedule and a language-adaptive switch to tailor learning to per-language difficulty. Empirical results on multilingual mathematical benchmarks show improved reasoning without language drift toward English, and the approach generalizes beyond mathematics.

6arXiv · cs.CL·19d ago·source ↗

LongTraceRL: Reinforcement Learning for Long-Context Reasoning via Search Agent Trajectories and Rubric Rewards

LongTraceRL is a new RL training framework for improving long-context reasoning in LLMs, addressing limitations of existing RLVR methods. It constructs challenging training data using multi-hop questions from knowledge graph random walks and tiered distractors derived from search agent trajectories (high-confusability: read but uncited; low-confusability: seen but unopened). A rubric reward provides entity-level process supervision along reasoning chains, applied only to correct responses to prevent reward hacking. Experiments across three LLMs (4B–30B parameters) on five long-context benchmarks show consistent improvements over strong baselines.

5arXiv · cs.CL·4d ago·source ↗

Systematic study of extrinsic and intrinsic properties for effective code interpreter reasoning in LLMs

Researchers investigate what behavioral properties make LLMs effective at reasoning with a Code Interpreter (CI), identifying two axes: extrinsic 'crucial tokens' and intrinsic 'cognitive behaviors' such as verification, backtracking, and backward chaining. Stronger CI reasoning models consistently exhibit higher prevalence of these properties. The paper shows that appending code-specific crucial tokens at inference time improves performance on mathematical, ordering, and optimization tasks, while augmenting training with cognitive behaviors improves SFT and RL performance in two of three evaluated models. The work also finds these behaviors reduce overthinking in incorrect responses and improve token efficiency.