Anthropic Responds to White House AI Action Plan, Calls for Transparency Standards and Export Controls
Anthropic published a policy response to the White House's 'Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan,' endorsing its focus on AI infrastructure, federal adoption, and safety research while urging additional steps on export controls and mandatory AI development transparency standards. The company highlighted alignment between the plan and its prior OSTP submissions, and noted its proactive activation of ASL-3 protections with Claude Opus 4 as evidence that safety and innovation are compatible. Anthropic called for a single national standard for frontier model transparency rather than a state-by-state patchwork, and encouraged continued investment in NIST's CAISI for evaluating frontier models on national security risks including CBRN capabilities.
Related guides (4)
Related events (8)
Anthropic submits AI Action Plan recommendations to White House OSTP
Anthropic submitted formal recommendations to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in response to its Request for Information on a U.S. AI Action Plan. The submission covers six areas: national security testing of AI models, tightening semiconductor export controls (including H20 chips), enhancing lab security via classified government-industry channels, scaling energy infrastructure to 50 GW by 2027, accelerating government AI adoption, and preparing for economic disruption. Anthropic cites its expectation that powerful AI systems matching Nobel Prize-level intellect will emerge in late 2026 or early 2027, framing the recommendations as urgent national security and economic imperatives.
Anthropic responds to California Governor Newsom's AI working group draft report
Anthropic published a formal response to the California Governor's Working Group on AI Frontier Models draft report, endorsing its emphasis on transparency and evidence-based policy. Anthropic argues that light-touch mandatory disclosure of safety and security practices would be beneficial without impeding innovation, noting that current voluntary practices are uneven across frontier labs. The response also references Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy and Economic Index as examples of existing transparency efforts, and signals urgency given Anthropic's view that powerful AI systems may arrive as early as end of 2026.
Anthropic submits AI accountability recommendations to NTIA, covering evals, red teaming, and pre-registration
Anthropic submitted a formal response to the NTIA's Request for Comment on AI Accountability, outlining a multi-part policy framework for governing advanced AI systems. Key recommendations include increased government funding for evaluation research, mandatory disclosure of evaluation methods, pre-registration of large training runs with national governments, mandated external red teaming before model release, and antitrust guidance to enable industry safety collaboration. The submission reflects Anthropic's core policy positions and advocates for risk-tiered oversight proportional to model capabilities.
Anthropic proposes federal AI transparency framework with mandatory Secure Development Frameworks and system cards
Anthropic published a policy proposal calling for a targeted AI transparency framework applicable at federal, state, or international levels, targeting only the largest frontier AI developers (suggested thresholds: ~$100M annual revenue or ~$1B R&D/capex). The framework would require covered developers to publicly disclose a Secure Development Framework covering CBRN and misalignment risks, publish system cards at deployment, self-certify compliance, and face legal liability for false statements. The proposal is explicitly lightweight and flexible, designed to avoid prescriptive standards while creating accountability mechanisms and whistleblower protections during the period before comprehensive safety standards are established.
Anthropic policy recap: US Executive Order, G7 Code of Conduct, and Bletchley Park AI Safety Summit
Anthropic published a policy commentary summarizing three major AI governance events from late October/early November 2023: the US Executive Order on AI, the G7 International Code of Conduct for advanced AI developers, and the UK-hosted Bletchley Park AI Safety Summit. The post covers Anthropic's positions on each, including support for NIST capacity-building, the G7 Code of Conduct, and the newly announced UK and US AI Safety Institutes. Dario Amodei presented Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy at Bletchley as a potential regulatory prototype, and the 28-country Bletchley Declaration notably included China among its signatories.
Dario Amodei Statement on Anthropic's Commitment to American AI Leadership and Policy Alignment
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published a public statement clarifying the company's policy positions and government relationships amid what he describes as inaccurate claims about Anthropic's stances. The statement highlights Anthropic's federal contracts (including a $200M DoD agreement), support for the Trump administration's AI Action Plan, opposition to a 10-year moratorium on state AI laws, and support for California's SB 53 requiring large AI developers to publish safety protocols. Amodei also addresses claims of model political bias, citing a Manhattan Institute study, and reiterates Anthropic's unique policy of restricting AI service sales to PRC-controlled companies.
Anthropic submits detailed recommendations to strengthen US AI chip export controls under Diffusion Rule
Anthropic filed a formal response to the Department of Commerce's 'Framework for Artificial Intelligence Diffusion' interim final rule, advocating for stronger export controls on advanced semiconductors to preserve US AI leadership. Key recommendations include adjusting the three-tier country classification system, lowering the no-license compute threshold for Tier 2 countries, and increasing enforcement funding for the Bureau of Industry and Security. Anthropic argues that Chinese firms like DeepSeek demonstrate export controls are working but warns of aggressive chip stockpiling and smuggling operations that undermine their effectiveness. The submission frames compute advantage as a national security imperative, warning that without strong controls, frontier AI infrastructure could offshore similarly to solar panels and semiconductors.
Anthropic commits to signing the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice
Anthropic announced its intention to sign the EU's General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, citing alignment with its existing Responsible Scaling Policy on transparency, safety, and accountability. The company frames the Code's mandatory Safety and Security Frameworks—including CBRN risk assessment—as complementary to its own internal standards. Anthropic also signals continued collaboration with the EU AI Office and third-party bodies like the Frontier Model Forum to keep standards adaptive as the technology evolves.