White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
white-house-office-of-science-and-technology-policy-ad0cbd2d·3 events·first seen 28d agoAliases: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Office of Science and Technology Policy
Co-occurring entities
More like this (12)
Recent events (3)
Anthropic submits AI Action Plan recommendations to White House OSTP
Anthropic submitted formal recommendations to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in response to its Request for Information on a U.S. AI Action Plan. The submission covers six areas: national security testing of AI models, tightening semiconductor export controls (including H20 chips), enhancing lab security via classified government-industry channels, scaling energy infrastructure to 50 GW by 2027, accelerating government AI adoption, and preparing for economic disruption. Anthropic cites its expectation that powerful AI systems matching Nobel Prize-level intellect will emerge in late 2026 or early 2027, framing the recommendations as urgent national security and economic imperatives.
Hugging Face Responds to White House AI Action Plan RFI
Hugging Face submitted a formal response to the White House AI Action Plan Request for Information, outlining its policy positions on AI development and governance. The response reflects the company's stance on open-source AI, safety, and regulatory frameworks. As a major open-weights model hub and tooling provider, Hugging Face's input represents a significant voice from the open AI ecosystem in shaping U.S. federal AI policy.
Anthropic Responds to White House AI Action Plan, Calls for Transparency Standards and Export Controls
Anthropic published a policy response to the White House's 'Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan,' endorsing its focus on AI infrastructure, federal adoption, and safety research while urging additional steps on export controls and mandatory AI development transparency standards. The company highlighted alignment between the plan and its prior OSTP submissions, and noted its proactive activation of ASL-3 protections with Claude Opus 4 as evidence that safety and innovation are compatible. Anthropic called for a single national standard for frontier model transparency rather than a state-by-state patchwork, and encouraged continued investment in NIST's CAISI for evaluating frontier models on national security risks including CBRN capabilities.