A new arXiv preprint investigates compute-optimal scaling for transformer-based vision-language models trained natively on multimodal inputs from scratch, rather than via late-fusion of separately pre-trained components. The authors derive power-law relationships between compute budget, model size, and token count, finding that language and multimodal objectives exhibit distinct scaling behaviors and that data mixture composition strongly influences optimal resource allocation. They also report positive cross-modal transfer effects, including improved pure-text spatial reasoning. The work establishes an efficiency frontier for configuring model size, token count, and data mixture under fixed compute.
OpenAI published foundational research establishing empirical scaling laws for neural language models, showing that model performance scales predictably with compute, data, and parameters. The work demonstrated power-law relationships between these factors and loss, providing a principled framework for allocating training resources. This paper became a cornerstone of modern large language model development strategy.
A new arXiv preprint presents a framework for modeling energy consumption during Transformer training on multiple GPUs, using BERT architectural sweeps to relate measured energy to proxies for compute, memory traffic, and hardware efficiency. The approach adapts roofline modeling with a speedup-based hardware-efficiency factor that accounts for tensor parallelism and fully sharded data parallelism. The resulting scaling law accurately predicts training energy across heterogeneous configurations, targeting sustainable and cost-aware system design.
A new arXiv preprint argues that training language models directly on visual representations of documents (figures, equations, page layouts) consistently outperforms text-only pretraining on the same underlying corpora. The authors conduct a systematic study of unsupervised visual pretraining paradigms across multiple backbones and benchmarks, framing visual pretraining as a scalable alternative to the dominant text-extraction pipeline. The result challenges a foundational assumption in LLM pretraining and has implications for how future foundation models are trained on visually rich sources like PDFs and web pages.
A new arXiv paper examines whether test-time scaling (TTS) transfers to small open vision-language models using EXAMS-V, a multilingual visual multiple-choice benchmark. The study compares self-consistency, describe-then-reason with PRM-guided beam search, and post-hoc selectors across Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct and Qwen3.5-4B. Key findings: prompt parseability and decoding budget (token limit) dominate gains, while elaborate search/verification methods like PRM-guided beam search underperform plain majority vote at 8x the cost. The best configuration achieves 84.1% on ImageCLEF 2026 test split, ranking first on the Visual MCQ leaderboard.
A new arXiv preprint investigates whether scaling compute improves the fidelity of LLM-based social simulations across three domains: opinion modeling, behavioral simulation, and longitudinal forecasting. Using 85 Qwen3-architecture models trained under fixed-compute budgets from 10^18 to 10^20 FLOPs, plus 35 larger open-weight models up to 70B parameters, the authors find strong scaling in most settings. However, longitudinal forecasting, underrepresented populations, and specific cognitive bias calibration tasks (e.g., risk aversion) scale poorly, with fine-tuning failing to close gaps from 0.5B to 8B parameters. The work provides empirical grounding for where scaling will and will not suffice for social simulation research.
Researchers propose the Shannon Scaling Law, a theoretical framework that models LLM training as information transmission over a noisy channel using the Shannon-Hartley theorem. By mapping model parameters to channel bandwidth and training tokens to signal power, the framework introduces a fundamental SNR-based capacity limit that explains non-monotonic phenomena like catastrophic overtraining and quantization-induced degradation that classical power-law scaling laws cannot capture. Validated on Pythia and OLMo2 under Gaussian noise, quantization, and fine-tuning perturbations, the law achieves strong R² scores and successfully extrapolates from 6.9B to 12B parameter models trained on up to 307B tokens. The framework outperforms both classical and perturbation-aware scaling laws, predicting U-shaped performance degradation when SNR is insufficient.
A new arXiv preprint introduces dynamic short convolutions as an architectural primitive for Transformers, using input-dependent filters to combine locality bias with increased expressivity. Experiments across 150M–2B parameter language models show consistent perplexity improvements over standard Transformers and static convolution variants, with scaling-law fits indicating a 1.33× compute advantage when applied to key/query/value vectors and 1.60× when added after every linear layer. The technique also improves linear RNNs (Mamba-2, Gated DeltaNet) and mixture-of-experts architectures, with custom Triton kernels making training practical.
A new arXiv paper analyzes why post-hoc linearization of causal self-attention degrades model quality, identifying key-dependent rank-1 orthogonal projections as the mechanism softmax relies on and explaining why delta-style networks outperform gated accumulation. The authors introduce structural interventions—sink tokens, short convolutions, and fixed-budget cache routing—applied in a frozen-backbone regime. Scaling across LLaMA and Qwen models up to 32B parameters, the approach outperforms prior post-hoc linearization baselines on MMLU and matches long-context retrieval of adaptive-caching frameworks.