SkillGenBench: Benchmarking Skill Generation Pipelines for LLM Agents
SkillGenBench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LLM agents to generate correct, reusable, and executable skills from raw repositories and documents, rather than merely using pre-provided skills. It covers two generation regimes (task-conditioned and task-agnostic) and two procedural sources (repository-grounded and document-grounded), with standardized execution-based evaluation protocols. Experiments across multiple skill-generation methods reveal substantial performance variation and distinct failure modes depending on source type. The benchmark aims to establish skill generation as an independent research problem within agent systems.
Related guides (2)
Related events (8)
SkillWeaver: Compositional Skill Routing for LLM Agents via Decompose-Retrieve-Compose
Researchers introduce SkillWeaver, a framework for compositional skill routing in LLM agents that decomposes complex queries into atomic sub-tasks, retrieves matching skills from a large library, and composes an executable DAG plan. The paper formalizes the Compositional Skill Routing problem and introduces CompSkillBench, a benchmark of 300 compositional queries over 2,209 real MCP server skills across 24 categories. A key finding is that task decomposition quality is the primary bottleneck, with standard LLM decomposition reaching only 34.2% category recall; the proposed Iterative Skill-Aware Decomposition (SAD) method improves decomposition accuracy from 51.0% to 67.7% in a single iteration. The framework also reduces context window consumption by over 99% compared to naive skill-stuffing approaches.
Systematic Study of Model-Generated Agent Skills Across the Full Skill Lifecycle
This paper presents a utility-grounded evaluation framework for model-generated agent skills, covering the full lifecycle of experience generation, skill extraction, and skill consumption across five agentic task domains. The authors find that while such skills are beneficial on average, they exhibit non-trivial negative transfer, and that skill utility is independent of model scale or baseline task strength. A key finding is that strong extractors are not necessarily strong consumers and vice versa. The work culminates in a 'meta-skill' that guides extraction toward utility-correlated features, consistently improving skill quality and reducing negative transfer.
SkillHarm: Lifecycle-Aware Benchmark for Skill-Based Attacks on AI Agents
SkillHarm is a new benchmark evaluating adversarial attacks on AI agent skills across their full use lifecycle, covering two attack scenarios: Fixed-Payload Poisoning (FPP) and Self-Mutating Poisoning (SMP). The benchmark includes 879 attack samples across 71 skills, organized under a 12-category risk taxonomy targeting data pipelines, system environments, and agent autonomy. Experiments show current agents remain highly vulnerable, with attack success rates up to 86.3% (FPP) and 69.3% (SMP). An automated construction pipeline called AutoSkillHarm, driven by coding agents, was used to generate the benchmark at scale.
SkillOpt: Systematic Text-Space Optimizer for Self-Evolving Agent Skills
SkillOpt introduces a principled optimization framework for agent skills, treating the skill document as an external trainable state analogous to model weights. A separate optimizer model converts scored rollouts into bounded edits (add/delete/replace) on a skill document, accepting only edits that improve held-out validation scores. Evaluated across six benchmarks, seven target models, and three execution harnesses (direct chat, Codex, Claude Code), SkillOpt achieves best or tied performance on all 52 evaluated cells, lifting GPT-5.5 no-skill accuracy by up to +24.8 points inside the Codex agentic loop. Optimized skill artifacts also transfer across model scales and execution environments without further optimization.
Benchmark Agent: Autonomous system for end-to-end benchmark construction
Researchers introduce Benchmark Agent, a fully autonomous agentic system that orchestrates the complete benchmark construction pipeline — from query analysis and subtask design to data annotation and quality control. The system was used to produce 15 benchmarks spanning text understanding, multimodal understanding, and domain-specific reasoning, with evaluation via human judges, LLM-as-a-judge, and consistency checks. The work addresses two persistent problems in the field: the labor intensity of benchmark creation and rapid performance saturation after release. Code and a demo will be publicly released.
MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering
OpenAI introduces MLE-bench, a benchmark designed to measure AI agent performance on machine learning engineering tasks. The benchmark draws from Kaggle competitions to evaluate agents on realistic ML engineering workflows. Initial results show that current agents, including those powered by o1-preview, achieve competitive performance on a subset of tasks but fall well short of top human competitors. The benchmark is intended to track progress in agentic ML capabilities over time.
MUSE-Autoskill: Self-Evolving LLM Agents via Skill Lifecycle Management
MUSE-Autoskill introduces a skill-centric agent framework where LLM agents continuously create, store, manage, evaluate, and refine reusable skills across tasks. The system adds skill-level memory that accumulates per-skill experience over time, enabling more effective reuse and cross-agent transfer. Experiments on SkillsBench show improvements in task success, efficiency, and reuse compared to static skill approaches.
PowerCodeBench: Knowledge Boundary Probing and Intervention for LLM-Based Power System Code Generation
This paper introduces PowerCodeBench, an execution-validated benchmark for evaluating LLMs on power-system simulation code generation using the pandapower library. The authors identify that failures are dominated by API-knowledge boundary errors (hallucinated function names, misused parameters) rather than reasoning failures, and propose a boundary-aware intervention combining API demand estimation with targeted documentation injection. Evaluated across ten open-weight models (1.5B–480B) and four commercial APIs on 2,000 tasks, the intervention yields 32–56 accuracy point improvements while using only 41% of baseline prompt-token cost. Open-weight models in the 70B–120B range match commercial mid-tier accuracy, with Llama-3.1-405B and Qwen3-Coder-480B leading.