Why AI hasn't replaced software engineers, and won't
A commentary piece from the AI Snake Oil / Normal Tech newsletter argues that coding agents should be understood as normal technology rather than transformative replacements for software engineers. The piece examines why AI has not displaced software engineering roles despite significant capability advances. This is a skeptical industry analysis relevant to ongoing debates about AI's impact on software development labor.
Related guides (2)
Related events (8)
Simon Willison: Why AI hasn't replaced software engineers, and won't
Simon Willison publishes a commentary piece arguing against the thesis that AI will replace software engineers. The piece comes from a respected practitioner voice with a track record of nuanced AI analysis. Without body content available, the title signals a counter-narrative to displacement claims that is likely to be widely circulated in practitioner communities.
AI as Normal Technology
A paper by the AI Snake Oil authors argues that AI should be understood as 'normal technology' rather than as something categorically unprecedented, a framing they plan to expand into a book. The piece appears to challenge dominant narratives about AI exceptionalism. The body is minimal, suggesting this is a teaser or announcement for forthcoming work.
Open Questions About the Future of Software Engineering
Andrew Ng offers a contrarian view against AI-driven mass unemployment forecasts, citing rising software engineering job postings from a Citadel Securities report as evidence that AI may expand rather than contract the profession. He outlines five emerging trends in software engineering—including the product management bottleneck, higher-level code interaction, and reduced technical debt costs—alongside open questions about team structure, curriculum, competitive advantage, and agent-driven workflows. The commentary frames these themes around DeepLearning.AI's upcoming AI Developer Conference on April 28-29 in San Francisco.
A Reality Check on the AI Jobs Hysteria
MIT Technology Review offers a critical analysis of current narratives around AI-driven white-collar job displacement, questioning whether recent tech-sector layoffs at companies like Coinbase, Meta, and Cisco genuinely signal broad AI-driven workforce disruption. The piece appears to push back on alarmist framing around AI's near-term labor market impact. It targets knowledge workers including software developers and financial analysts as the focal demographic in the debate.
Real AI Agents and Real Work
A commentary piece from One Useful Thing examining the practical deployment of AI agents in real work contexts, framing the tension between human-centered work and AI-generated productivity outputs. The piece appears to analyze how autonomous AI agents are changing knowledge work workflows. Published by a Tier 2 source known for applied AI analysis aimed at practitioners and researchers.
New paper: AI agents that matter
A paper from the AI Snake Oil / Normal Tech group critiques current AI agent benchmarking and evaluation practices. The work argues that existing agent benchmarks are poorly designed for assessing real-world utility, and calls for rethinking how agent performance is measured. The commentary targets the gap between benchmark scores and practical deployment value.
Is AI Progress Slowing Down?
A commentary piece from the AI Snake Oil newsletter examines recent claims and trends around whether AI progress is decelerating. The article appears to analyze the evidence for and against a slowdown in frontier AI development. As a tier-2 commentary source, it likely synthesizes public signals rather than presenting original research.
Andrew Ng Argues AI Will Not Destroy the Job Market
Andrew Ng's weekly letter pushes back on the 'AI jobpocalypse' narrative, arguing that net job creation from AI will exceed job destruction, consistent with historical technology waves. He attributes the doom narrative to incentives of frontier labs, AI SaaS companies anchoring pricing to salaries, and businesses obscuring pandemic-era overhiring. He notes U.S. unemployment remains at 4.3% and software engineering hiring is still strong despite AI coding tools, and predicts an 'AI jobapalooza' of new roles instead.