Researchers propose Direct-OPD (Direct On-Policy Distillation), a method for transferring the policy shift induced by reinforcement learning on a small model to a larger target model, bypassing the need to run expensive RL rollouts on the stronger model. The approach uses the log-ratio between a post-RL teacher and its pre-RL reference as a dense implicit reward signal applied to the student's own on-policy states. Empirically, Direct-OPD improves Qwen3-1.7B from 48.3% to 62.4% on AIME 2024 in 4 hours on 8 A100 GPUs, outperforming step-matched direct RL. The method addresses a key scalability bottleneck in post-training as frontier models grow larger.
Researchers propose Multi-teacher On-Policy Distillation (MOPD), a post-training paradigm that first trains domain-specialized RL teacher models, then distills them into a student model using on-policy rollouts to eliminate exposure bias. Evaluated on Qwen3-30B-A3B, MOPD outperforms Mix-RL, Cascade RL, Off-Policy Finetune, and Param-Merge baselines while preserving nearly all per-domain capability. The method has been deployed in production for MiMo-V2-Flash, an industrial-scale frontier model, validating its practical applicability. The approach also enables parallel, decoupled development of domain teachers, reducing cross-domain interference in multi-capability post-training.
This paper investigates whether full rollouts are required during on-policy distillation (OPD) for training reasoning models, identifying rollout horizon as a key computational bottleneck. The authors propose two strategies: Progressive OPD (POPD), which gradually expands rollout horizon during training, and Truncated OPD (TOPD), which uses permanently truncated rollouts. Experiments on mathematical reasoning show POPD achieves up to 3× training efficiency improvement, while TOPD matches full OPD performance using only 10% of the rollout horizon, yielding significant wall-clock and memory savings.
Researchers introduce On-Policy Co-Distillation (OPCoD), a training framework where two LLMs, each stronger in a different domain, iteratively tutor each other using on-policy rollouts and peer feedback. The method uses cognizance-based gating to control when feedback is given and feedback anchoring to ground it in the problem context. On Science Q&A tasks, OPCoD achieves Pareto improvement for both models across all evaluated domain pairs, outperforming one-way distillation and single-model fine-tuning baselines.
Researchers introduce DOPD (Dual On-policy Distillation), a knowledge distillation framework that dynamically routes token-level supervision between a privileged teacher and privileged student policy based on advantage gap and relative probabilities. The method addresses a failure mode called 'privilege illusion,' where information asymmetry between teacher and student is conflated with a transferable capability gap. Experiments on both LLM and VLM settings show DOPD outperforms vanilla on-policy distillation and related methods, with additional gains on stability, continual learning, and out-of-distribution tasks.
A new arXiv paper analyzes on-policy distillation (OPD) — a post-training method combining on-policy student trajectories with dense teacher supervision — across language and vision-language model pairs. The authors find that OPD updates are coordinate-sparse and distributed across layers (FFN-heavy), and that training only the discovered sparse subnetwork recovers near-full performance. Geometrically, updates are numerically full-rank but spectrally concentrated, falling disproportionately on near-zero weight coordinates, suggesting OPD retains distinct geometric signatures rather than behaving like ordinary dense parameter rewriting.
Researchers introduce d-OPSD, the first on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) framework designed specifically for diffusion large language models (dLLMs). The method addresses a fundamental mismatch between existing autoregressive OPSD approaches and dLLMs' arbitrary-order generation by using suffix conditioning on self-generated answers and step-level rather than token-level divergence supervision. Across four reasoning benchmarks, d-OPSD outperforms RLVR and SFT baselines while requiring only ~10% of the optimization steps of RLVR, suggesting strong sample efficiency gains for dLLM post-training.
A new arXiv paper analyzes on-policy self-distillation, where a single model serves as both teacher and student conditioned on correct demonstrations, finding it achieves strong pass@1 accuracy but at the cost of reduced rollout diversity and flattened pass@k curves. The authors trace this to compounding biases: teacher feedback is channeled through the model's own biases, amplifying probability mass on already-dominant modes rather than preserving diversity across equally correct solutions. Theoretical analysis shows the self-distillation policy tilts the base distribution by pointwise conditional mutual information, unlike ideal on-policy RL which preserves probability ratios among correct rollouts. Empirical results on graph path-finding and science QA benchmarks confirm self-distilled models match RL on average performance but fail on out-of-distribution settings requiring diverse strategies.
A new arXiv preprint identifies why on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) consistently degrades long chain-of-thought reasoning models: the teacher's supervision signal is dominated by reference-induced shortcuts rather than question-conditioned, transferable corrections. The authors propose a two-step fix using a reference-only teacher to isolate the non-transferable component and pointwise mutual information (PMI) to construct a cleaner distillation target. Experiments across four long-CoT models on two datasets show consistent improvements over both the base model and standard OPSD while preserving reflective reasoning behavior.