Almanac
← Events
5arXiv cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence)·25d ago

Governed Evolution of Agent Runtimes through Executable Operational Cognition

This paper proposes a framework for governed runtime evolution in multi-agent systems, formalizing agent-generated code artifacts as persistent runtime capabilities rather than transient outputs. It introduces HarnessMutation, a lifecycle-aware mechanism for runtime adaptation operating under explicit validation, traceability, evaluation, and rollback constraints. The framework models agent self-modification as a bounded, observable, and auditable process over persistent operational memory, building on prior 'Code as Agent Harness' work.

Related guides (2)

Related events (8)

7arXiv · cs.CL·9d ago·source ↗

Recursive Agent Harnesses (RAH): harness recursion extends model recursion for long-context coding agents

A new arXiv preprint introduces the Recursive Agent Harness (RAH), a pattern where a parent agent generates executable scripts that spawn parallel subagent harnesses with filesystem tools, code execution, and planning capabilities. The authors frame this as 'harness recursion', a code-first extension of model recursion from recursive language models. Evaluated on the Oolong-Synthetic long-context benchmark, RAH improves over the Codex coding-agent baseline from 71.75% to 81.36% with GPT-5 as backbone, and reaches 89.77% with Claude Sonnet 4.5. The work connects emerging production patterns (e.g., Anthropic's dynamic workflows) to a formal architectural concept.

6arXiv · cs.CL·1mo ago·source ↗

Code as Agent Harness: A Survey of Code as Operational Substrate for Agentic AI Systems

This survey paper introduces the concept of 'code as agent harness,' framing code not merely as output but as the operational infrastructure for LLM-based agents—covering reasoning, action, environment modeling, and execution-based verification. The authors organize the analysis across three layers: harness interface, harness mechanisms (planning, memory, tool use, feedback control), and scaling to multi-agent systems. Applications span coding assistants, GUI/OS automation, embodied agents, scientific discovery, and enterprise workflows. Open challenges include evaluation beyond task success, verification under incomplete feedback, and human oversight for safety-critical actions.

6arXiv · cs.AI·1mo ago·source ↗

A Methodology for Selecting and Composing Runtime Architecture Patterns for Production LLM Agents

This paper introduces the stochastic-deterministic boundary (SDB) as a foundational architectural primitive for production LLM agent runtimes, defining it as a four-part contract (proposer, verifier, commit step, reject signal) governing how LLM outputs become system actions. The authors organize agent runtime design around Coordination, State, and Control concerns, presenting a catalog of six runtime patterns applicable to conversational, autonomous, and long-horizon agents. A five-step pattern-selection methodology and diagnostic procedure mapping production failures to pattern weaknesses are contributed, along with a newly named failure mode—replay divergence—where LLM consumers of deterministic event logs produce inconsistent outputs across model versions or prompt changes. The paper argues that as model variance decreases, architectural pattern choice and SDB strength become the dominant reliability levers.

7arXiv · cs.AI·1mo ago·source ↗

MOSS: Self-Evolving Agents via Source-Level Code Rewriting

MOSS is a system enabling autonomous agents to self-evolve by rewriting their own source code rather than being limited to text-mutable artifacts like prompts or skill files. The system anchors each evolution cycle to production-failure evidence, delegates code modification to an external coding-agent CLI, and verifies candidates by replaying failures in ephemeral trial workers before promoting via consent-gated container swap with rollback. On the OpenClaw benchmark, MOSS improves a four-task mean grader score from 0.25 to 0.61 in a single cycle without human intervention. The authors argue source-level adaptation is strictly more general than text-layer evolution, being Turing-complete and immune to long-context drift.

5arXiv · cs.AI·2d ago·source ↗

Distributionally robust optimization framework for probabilistic runtime verification of AI agents

A new arXiv preprint introduces a sound and efficient framework for verifying probabilistic security policies for AI agents operating in complex digital environments, addressing limitations of prior Datalog-based approaches that assumed deterministic policies or predicate independence. The method uses distributionally robust optimization to compute sound upper bounds on policy violation probability without requiring independence assumptions between predicates. Evaluated on benchmarks for terminal and tool-calling agents, the approach outperforms prior art on the security-utility trade-off.

5Hugging Face Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

CodeAgents + Structure: A Better Way to Execute Actions

Hugging Face published a blog post exploring the combination of code-based agents with structured outputs to improve action execution reliability. The post examines how enforcing structured generation can reduce errors and improve the robustness of agentic code execution pipelines. This represents a practical engineering approach to making code agents more dependable in production settings.

5arXiv · cs.AI·12d ago·source ↗

Role-Agent: Bootstrapping LLM Agents via Dual-Role Evolution

Role-Agent is a new framework that uses a single LLM simultaneously as both agent and environment, enabling self-bootstrapped co-evolution without external environment feedback. The system has two components: World-In-Agent (WIA), which uses predicted vs. actual state alignment as a process reward, and Agent-In-World (AIW), which reshapes training data by retrieving tasks with similar failure patterns. Experiments across multiple benchmarks show an average performance gain of over 4% over strong baselines. The approach addresses key limitations in LLM agent training: inefficient feedback and static environments.

7Openai Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

From model to agent: Equipping the Responses API with a computer environment

OpenAI describes how it built an agent runtime by combining the Responses API with a shell tool and hosted containers, enabling agents to operate with persistent files, tools, and state. The architecture supports secure, scalable execution of agentic workflows. This represents a concrete infrastructure layer for deploying agents in production environments.