4arXiv cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence)·
Systematic review lays groundwork for agentic AI governance frameworks
A new arXiv preprint presents a systematic literature review on governance of agentic AI systems, identifying features that distinguish agentic AI from traditional generative systems and why those features warrant targeted regulatory attention. The authors synthesize prevailing governance priorities, proposed mechanisms, and stakeholder roles emerging in the field. The paper positions itself as preliminary groundwork for a structured governance roadmap, framing 2025 as a pivotal year for agentic AI deployment.
Related guides (3)
Related events (8)
Practices for Governing Agentic AI Systems
OpenAI published a framework document outlining governance practices for agentic AI systems. The piece addresses how to manage AI agents that take sequences of actions, make decisions, and operate with varying degrees of autonomy. It likely covers topics such as human oversight, authorization boundaries, and accountability structures for agentic deployments.
Welcome to the AGI era of AI governance
A commentary piece from Interconnects argues that AI governance has entered an 'AGI era,' framing this as a one-way transition that the field was unprepared for. The piece appears to analyze the governance and policy implications of AI systems reaching or approaching AGI-level capabilities. The framing suggests a significant shift in how AI oversight and regulation must be approached.
Governance of Superintelligence
OpenAI published a position piece arguing that now is the appropriate time to begin developing governance frameworks for superintelligence—AI systems conceived as dramatically more capable than AGI. The post signals OpenAI's view that existing regulatory approaches will be insufficient for superintelligent systems and calls for new international coordination mechanisms. It represents an early public framing by a major lab of the policy challenges specific to post-AGI AI.
Anthropic publishes framework for safe and trustworthy agent development
Anthropic released a formal framework for responsible agent development, articulating principles around human oversight, transparency, value alignment, and privacy for autonomous AI agents. The document draws on Claude Code as a reference implementation and cites enterprise deployments at Trellix and Block as real-world examples. The framework is positioned as a contribution to emerging industry standards for agentic AI systems, acknowledging open technical challenges in value alignment measurement and oversight calibration.
Establishing AI and Data Sovereignty in the Age of Autonomous Systems
MIT Technology Review commentary argues that enterprises made an implicit trade-off when adopting generative AI—gaining capability at the cost of data control and governance. The piece examines the emerging concept of AI and data sovereignty as autonomous systems become more prevalent in enterprise settings. It frames the challenge as a structural tension between third-party AI model dependency and organizational control over proprietary data.
Anthropic publishes foundational 'Core Views on AI Safety' position paper
Anthropic released a detailed position paper outlining their core views on AI safety, arguing that transformative AI could arrive within a decade driven by predictable scaling laws, and that no one currently knows how to train powerful AI systems to robustly behave well. The document explains Anthropic's founding rationale and research strategy, highlighting four priority areas: scaling supervision, mechanistic interpretability, process-oriented learning, and understanding AI generalization. Originally published March 2023, this represents Anthropic's canonical public statement of their safety philosophy and strategic priorities.
Taxonomy and governance gap analysis for AI contributors in open-source software
A preprint from arXiv analyzes how open-source organizations are handling AI-generated and agent-driven contributions, comparing policies across six major projects (SymPy, LLVM, matplotlib, OpenInfra, Apache Software Foundation, Linux Foundation). The authors develop a six-dimensional taxonomy covering disclosure, responsibility, human oversight, licensing, enforcement, and maintainer workload, and score each organization's policy maturity. The paper maps documented agent incidents onto governance gaps and identifies misalignments with emerging regulatory frameworks including the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO/IEC 42001, proposing a harmonized tiered framework.
A Guide to Which AI to Use in the Agentic Era
A tier-2 commentary piece from One Useful Thing offering guidance on selecting AI systems in the current agentic era, signaling a shift in framing from chatbots to agents as the primary use-case paradigm. The piece appears to survey the landscape of available AI tools and their appropriate applications. As a practitioner-oriented guide, it reflects the growing complexity of the AI tooling ecosystem as agentic capabilities proliferate.