Almanac
← Events
4arXiv cs.CL (Computation and Language)·1mo ago

LLM-Based Grammar Adaptation for Metamodel-Grammar Co-Evolution in Model-Driven Engineering

This paper proposes using LLMs to automate grammar adaptation when metamodels evolve in model-driven engineering, replacing tedious manual work and outperforming rule-based methods. Evaluated on six real-world Xtext DSLs using Claude Sonnet 4.5, ChatGPT 5.1, and Gemini 3, all three LLMs achieved 100% adaptation consistency on test DSLs versus 62-84% for rule-based approaches. A longitudinal study on QVTo showed LLMs successfully reused learned adaptations across all evolution steps without manual editing. However, on large-scale grammars (EAST-ADL, 297 rules), LLM adaptation consistency dropped well below 90%, revealing a scalability limitation.

Related guides (1)

Related events (8)

5arXiv · cs.CL·23d ago·source ↗

Towards Reliable Multilingual LLMs-as-a-Judge: An Empirical Study

This paper systematically investigates strategies for extending LLM-based automatic evaluation (LLMs-as-a-Judge) to multilingual settings, covering high-, mid-, and low-resource languages (English, Spanish, Basque). The authors compare instruction translation, monolingual vs. multilingual supervision, and model size, finding that fine-tuned smaller models can match proprietary models when in-domain data is available, while zero-shot larger models are preferable out-of-domain. Two meta-evaluation datasets are extended to Spanish and Basque, and all data and code are publicly released.

5arXiv · cs.CL·10d ago·source ↗

Audit finds cultural translation failures and diversity collapse in LLM-adapted math word problems across 7 languages

Researchers audited how Claude Opus 4, GPT-4.1, and Gemini 2.5 Pro adapt 60 English math word problems into seven languages spanning South Asia and Italy, annotating 6,489 entity transformations. Models agreed on transformation type only 62.5% of the time and on specific substitutions in just 33.5% of cases, meaning model choice substantially shapes the cultural world students encounter. All 21 language-model combinations exhibited 'entropy collapse'—adaptations compressed rather than expanded cultural diversity—and models produced systematic regional misattributions (e.g., Bangladeshi currency for Indian Bengali students) and cross-cultural contamination (e.g., egg hunts framed as Eid activities). The study highlights that surface plausibility masks deeper corpus-level failures invisible in individual translations.

6arXiv · cs.CL·1mo ago·source ↗

Tracing the Emergence of Human-Like Pragmatic Reasoning in LLMs Across Languages

Researchers conducted a population-matching experiment evaluating 25 LLMs on conditional inference tasks across four languages, comparing model behavior to matched human populations. The study finds that LLMs function as accurate semantic operators but systematically fail to capture pragmatic enrichments—context-sensitive inferences beyond literal logical meaning—that humans apply effortlessly. Model performance on pragmatic reasoning is not predicted by open vs. closed weights, training orientation, or architecture type, suggesting pragmatic reasoning remains an emergent and unreliable capability. The findings contribute to ongoing debates about whether LLMs reason like humans or merely approximate surface-level linguistic patterns.

6arXiv · cs.CL·12d ago·source ↗

LLM-guided MAP-Elites evolution improves medical decision pipelines at inference time

Researchers propose using LLM-guided MAP-Elites evolutionary search as an inference-time alternative to fine-tuning for adapting LLMs to clinical workflows, formulating triage, consultation, and image classification as evolutionary searches over executable artifacts. Across three medical settings, evolved programs substantially outperform manually designed baselines: triage accuracy improves from 77.3% to 87.1% and emergency recall from 0.60 to 0.97, with gains also shown on MIMIC-ESI, iCRAFTMD, and PneumoniaMNIST. The approach works across Llama-3, Qwen-3.5, and Gemma-4 backbones and produces interpretable program-level mechanisms rather than superficial prompt changes.

4arXiv · cs.CL·1mo ago·source ↗

Study: LLM-Derived Error Highlights and APE Suggestions in MT Post-Editing

Researchers conducted a controlled study with professional En-Nl translators comparing post-editing (PE) workflows augmented with LLM-derived error highlights and automatic post-editing (APE) correction suggestions against regular PE and QE-derived highlights. No condition produced measurable productivity or quality gains over standard PE. However, APE-derived highlights were preferred over QE-derived highlights, and correction suggestions improved subjective user experience.

4Hugging Face Blog·1mo ago·source ↗

Open-Source Text Generation & LLM Ecosystem at Hugging Face

Hugging Face published a blog post surveying the open-source LLM ecosystem as of mid-2023, covering text generation models, tooling, and deployment patterns available on the platform. The post highlights the breadth of open-weight models and associated infrastructure for inference and fine-tuning. It serves as a reference overview of the state of open-source LLMs at that point in time.

5arXiv · cs.CL·19d ago·source ↗

LLMs Show Inverted Compositional Strengths vs. Humans on Reference Resolution Task

This paper evaluates LLMs and humans on the Personal Relation Task (Paperno 2022), distinguishing between Extensional tasks (resolving what an expression refers to) and Intensional tasks (representing structured sense/formula). The study finds that humans outperform LLMs on Extensional tasks while LLMs outperform humans on Intensional tasks—an inverted pattern of strengths. The authors argue this asymmetry reflects the absence of referential grounding in LLM training as a key gap in human-like language understanding.

4arXiv · cs.CL·19d ago·source ↗

Benchmarking Local LLMs for Confidential Translation Workflows

This paper evaluates locally runnable LLMs (via Ollama) for offline, privacy-constrained translation workflows targeting freelance translators and smaller language service providers. The authors expand their Reeve Foundation corpus to include German and Simplified Chinese, then benchmark local models across four language directions against commercial NMTs (DeepL, Baidu), a frontier LLM (GPT-5.2), and professional local NMT systems. Results show substantial performance variation by language direction and model size, with the best local LLMs matching or exceeding local NMT systems and the frontier LLM, though falling short of top commercial NMTs. The study supports the viability of local LLMs for confidentiality-sensitive translation use cases.