This paper identifies that vanilla on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) is a special case (β=1) of a broader policy-optimization family parameterized by a KL penalty weight β. The authors derive β-OPSD, whose optimal policy is a geometric interpolation between a reference policy and a privileged teacher, and implement it efficiently by mixing token-level logits rather than running full RL. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks show β-OPSD improves optimization stability and downstream performance over vanilla OPSD.
A new arXiv preprint identifies why on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) consistently degrades long chain-of-thought reasoning models: the teacher's supervision signal is dominated by reference-induced shortcuts rather than question-conditioned, transferable corrections. The authors propose a two-step fix using a reference-only teacher to isolate the non-transferable component and pointwise mutual information (PMI) to construct a cleaner distillation target. Experiments across four long-CoT models on two datasets show consistent improvements over both the base model and standard OPSD while preserving reflective reasoning behavior.
DemoPSD is a new training framework for LLMs that addresses two failure modes in on-policy self-distillation (OPSD): overfitting to in-domain patterns and privileged information leakage, where the student model learns answer-dependent shortcuts unavailable at test time. The method steers the student toward a reverse-KL barycenter target — a weighted geometric blend of teacher and student distributions — with token-level blending weights derived from the disagreement between the two distributions. Experiments on SciKnowEval across four scientific domains show DemoPSD outperforms GRPO and SDPO while maintaining higher training entropy and generalizing to out-of-distribution GPQA benchmarks.
Researchers introduce d-OPSD, the first on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) framework designed specifically for diffusion large language models (dLLMs). The method addresses a fundamental mismatch between existing autoregressive OPSD approaches and dLLMs' arbitrary-order generation by using suffix conditioning on self-generated answers and step-level rather than token-level divergence supervision. Across four reasoning benchmarks, d-OPSD outperforms RLVR and SFT baselines while requiring only ~10% of the optimization steps of RLVR, suggesting strong sample efficiency gains for dLLM post-training.
A new arXiv paper analyzes on-policy distillation (OPD) — a post-training method combining on-policy student trajectories with dense teacher supervision — across language and vision-language model pairs. The authors find that OPD updates are coordinate-sparse and distributed across layers (FFN-heavy), and that training only the discovered sparse subnetwork recovers near-full performance. Geometrically, updates are numerically full-rank but spectrally concentrated, falling disproportionately on near-zero weight coordinates, suggesting OPD retains distinct geometric signatures rather than behaving like ordinary dense parameter rewriting.
Researchers propose Direct-OPD (Direct On-Policy Distillation), a method for transferring the policy shift induced by reinforcement learning on a small model to a larger target model, bypassing the need to run expensive RL rollouts on the stronger model. The approach uses the log-ratio between a post-RL teacher and its pre-RL reference as a dense implicit reward signal applied to the student's own on-policy states. Empirically, Direct-OPD improves Qwen3-1.7B from 48.3% to 62.4% on AIME 2024 in 4 hours on 8 A100 GPUs, outperforming step-matched direct RL. The method addresses a key scalability bottleneck in post-training as frontier models grow larger.
Researchers from NAVER AI introduce On-Policy Delta Distillation (OPD²), a new post-training method that replaces direct imitation of a teacher model's output distribution with a 'delta signal' — the difference between the teacher and its pre-instruction-tuning base model. This delta signal isolates the reasoning capability changes induced by instruction tuning, providing a more targeted supervision signal for student models. Experiments across math, science, and code-reasoning benchmarks show OPD² consistently outperforms conventional on-policy distillation with shorter post-training periods.
This paper investigates whether full rollouts are required during on-policy distillation (OPD) for training reasoning models, identifying rollout horizon as a key computational bottleneck. The authors propose two strategies: Progressive OPD (POPD), which gradually expands rollout horizon during training, and Truncated OPD (TOPD), which uses permanently truncated rollouts. Experiments on mathematical reasoning show POPD achieves up to 3× training efficiency improvement, while TOPD matches full OPD performance using only 10% of the rollout horizon, yielding significant wall-clock and memory savings.
A new arXiv paper analyzes on-policy self-distillation, where a single model serves as both teacher and student conditioned on correct demonstrations, finding it achieves strong pass@1 accuracy but at the cost of reduced rollout diversity and flattened pass@k curves. The authors trace this to compounding biases: teacher feedback is channeled through the model's own biases, amplifying probability mass on already-dominant modes rather than preserving diversity across equally correct solutions. Theoretical analysis shows the self-distillation policy tilts the base distribution by pointwise conditional mutual information, unlike ideal on-policy RL which preserves probability ratios among correct rollouts. Empirical results on graph path-finding and science QA benchmarks confirm self-distilled models match RL on average performance but fail on out-of-distribution settings requiring diverse strategies.