localized-adaptation-reveals-distinct-learning-signatures-in-transformers-c56216ff·1 events·first seen Aliases: Localized Adaptation Reveals Distinct Learning Signatures in Transformers
A new arXiv preprint introduces a controlled benchmark spanning five learning objectives (lexical binding, factual association, behavioral policy, causal mapping, procedural reasoning) to study how adaptation site shapes what transformers learn, how well it generalizes, and how selectively it applies. The authors define each objective's 'adaptation geometry' as its profile under full-stack versus early-, middle-, or late-layer LoRA. Key findings include that factual association favors late-layer adaptation, behavioral learning separates late-layer acquisition from middle-layer gating, and causal/procedural transfer benefits most from middle or full-stack updates. Results replicate across five model families under parameter-matched controls, establishing adaptation site as a meaningful design variable.