Anthropic Strengthens Regional Restrictions to Block China-Controlled Entities
Anthropic is updating its Terms of Service to prohibit access by companies whose ownership structures subject them to control from restricted jurisdictions, including China, regardless of where those companies are incorporated or operate. The new rule targets entities more than 50% owned directly or indirectly by companies headquartered in unsupported regions, closing a loophole where Chinese-controlled firms accessed Anthropic services through foreign subsidiaries. Anthropic cites national security risks including potential data sharing with intelligence services, model distillation for adversarial AI development, and support for authoritarian military objectives. The announcement also reaffirms Anthropic's advocacy for export controls, domestic AI infrastructure buildout, and national-security-focused model evaluations.
Related guides (4)
Related events (8)
Andrew Ng argues Anthropic's usage restrictions and U.S. export controls on frontier AI accelerate push for open alternatives
Andrew Ng's editorial in The Batch analyzes two recent events: Anthropic restricting use of its 'Fable 5' model for LLM research (including initially degrading outputs silently for detected researchers), and the U.S. Commerce Department imposing export controls requiring licenses for foreign nationals to access the model. Ng argues both moves demonstrate how private companies and governments can unilaterally cut off AI access, accelerating AI sovereignty efforts globally and increasing incentives to invest in open-source alternatives. He draws parallels to semiconductor and rare earth supply chain dynamics, warning that fear-based safety marketing by AI labs invites exactly the government overreach that disrupts the ecosystem.
U.S. Department of War bans Anthropic, contracts OpenAI for classified AI systems after standoff over safety restrictions
The U.S. Department of War designated Anthropic a supply-chain risk to national security after the company refused to remove restrictions on Claude's use for domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons, effectively banning it from military and contractor use. OpenAI signed a contract allowing use of its models 'for all lawful purposes' with ambiguous carve-outs for surveillance and autonomous weapons, which Altman later called rushed and renegotiated. The standoff culminated in a Trump Truth Social post threatening civil and criminal consequences against Anthropic, followed by Hegseth's formal designation. The episode marks a significant precedent: the supply-chain risk designation, previously applied only to foreign companies, was used against a U.S. AI lab over its own usage policies.
Anthropic submits detailed recommendations to strengthen US AI chip export controls under Diffusion Rule
Anthropic filed a formal response to the Department of Commerce's 'Framework for Artificial Intelligence Diffusion' interim final rule, advocating for stronger export controls on advanced semiconductors to preserve US AI leadership. Key recommendations include adjusting the three-tier country classification system, lowering the no-license compute threshold for Tier 2 countries, and increasing enforcement funding for the Bureau of Industry and Security. Anthropic argues that Chinese firms like DeepSeek demonstrate export controls are working but warns of aggressive chip stockpiling and smuggling operations that undermine their effectiveness. The submission frames compute advantage as a national security imperative, warning that without strong controls, frontier AI infrastructure could offshore similarly to solar panels and semiconductors.
Anthropic Updates Usage Policy: Agentic Use, Cybersecurity, and Political Content
Anthropic has revised its Usage Policy effective September 15, 2025, with changes addressing agentic and cybersecurity risks, political content restrictions, law enforcement use clarity, and high-risk consumer-facing requirements. New sections explicitly prohibit malicious computer/network compromise activities while supporting legitimate security research, responding to the rapid expansion of agentic tools like Claude Code and Computer Use. The policy also narrows its previous blanket ban on political content to focus specifically on deceptive or voter-targeting uses, enabling legitimate civic and policy research. High-risk safeguards (human-in-the-loop, AI disclosure) are clarified to apply only to consumer-facing outputs, not B2B interactions.
Anthropic updates Usage Policy with election integrity, high-risk use case, and privacy rules
Anthropic revised its Acceptable Use Policy (renamed Usage Policy), effective June 6, 2024, consolidating prohibited-use categories into 'Universal Usage Standards.' Key changes include explicit bans on AI-assisted election interference and political campaigning, new safety requirements for high-risk use cases (healthcare, legal), expanded access for minors via API partners with safety disclosures, and stronger privacy protections including prohibitions on biometric inference and government-directed censorship. The update reflects both evolving regulatory context and Anthropic's stated safety mission.
Anthropic Responds to Department of War Supply Chain Risk Designation
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei issued a public statement after the U.S. Department of War formally designated Anthropic as a supply chain risk to national security, confirming the company will challenge the designation in court. Amodei clarified that the designation under 10 USC 3252 has narrow scope, affecting only direct use of Claude within Department of War contracts rather than all customers with such contracts. Anthropic committed to continuing to provide models to the Department of War and national security community at nominal cost during any transition period, while reiterating its two narrow usage exceptions: fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance. Amodei also apologized for a leaked internal post written on a difficult day, characterizing it as out-of-date and not reflecting his considered views.
Anthropic Responds to White House AI Action Plan, Calls for Transparency Standards and Export Controls
Anthropic published a policy response to the White House's 'Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan,' endorsing its focus on AI infrastructure, federal adoption, and safety research while urging additional steps on export controls and mandatory AI development transparency standards. The company highlighted alignment between the plan and its prior OSTP submissions, and noted its proactive activation of ASL-3 protections with Claude Opus 4 as evidence that safety and innovation are compatible. Anthropic called for a single national standard for frontier model transparency rather than a state-by-state patchwork, and encouraged continued investment in NIST's CAISI for evaluating frontier models on national security risks including CBRN capabilities.
Anthropic Resists DoD 'Supply Chain Risk' Designation Over Autonomous Weapons and Mass Surveillance Exceptions
Anthropic has issued a public statement responding to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's announcement that the Department of War intends to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk, following a breakdown in negotiations. The dispute centers on two exceptions Anthropic requested to Claude's use: mass domestic surveillance of Americans and fully autonomous weapons. Anthropic argues the designation is legally unsound under 10 USC 3252, would only affect DoW contract work rather than commercial customers, and pledges to challenge any formal designation in court. The company states it has supported US government classified networks since June 2024 and intends to continue all lawful national security uses.