Anthropic Responds to Department of War Supply Chain Risk Designation
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei issued a public statement after the U.S. Department of War formally designated Anthropic as a supply chain risk to national security, confirming the company will challenge the designation in court. Amodei clarified that the designation under 10 USC 3252 has narrow scope, affecting only direct use of Claude within Department of War contracts rather than all customers with such contracts. Anthropic committed to continuing to provide models to the Department of War and national security community at nominal cost during any transition period, while reiterating its two narrow usage exceptions: fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance. Amodei also apologized for a leaked internal post written on a difficult day, characterizing it as out-of-date and not reflecting his considered views.
Related guides (4)
Related events (8)
Anthropic Resists DoD 'Supply Chain Risk' Designation Over Autonomous Weapons and Mass Surveillance Exceptions
Anthropic has issued a public statement responding to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's announcement that the Department of War intends to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk, following a breakdown in negotiations. The dispute centers on two exceptions Anthropic requested to Claude's use: mass domestic surveillance of Americans and fully autonomous weapons. Anthropic argues the designation is legally unsound under 10 USC 3252, would only affect DoW contract work rather than commercial customers, and pledges to challenge any formal designation in court. The company states it has supported US government classified networks since June 2024 and intends to continue all lawful national security uses.
Dario Amodei Statement: Anthropic Refuses DoD Demands to Remove Safeguards on Mass Surveillance and Autonomous Weapons
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has published a public statement disclosing that the U.S. Department of War (formerly Defense) has demanded Anthropic accede to 'any lawful use' of Claude and remove safeguards in two specific areas: mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. Anthropic refuses, citing democratic values and current AI reliability limitations, despite threats of contract termination, a 'supply chain risk' designation, and potential invocation of the Defense Production Act. The statement confirms Claude is already extensively deployed across DoD and intelligence community systems for mission-critical applications including intelligence analysis, operational planning, and cyber operations. Anthropic states it will facilitate a smooth transition if offboarded, but will not remove the two contested safeguards.
U.S. Department of War bans Anthropic, contracts OpenAI for classified AI systems after standoff over safety restrictions
The U.S. Department of War designated Anthropic a supply-chain risk to national security after the company refused to remove restrictions on Claude's use for domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons, effectively banning it from military and contractor use. OpenAI signed a contract allowing use of its models 'for all lawful purposes' with ambiguous carve-outs for surveillance and autonomous weapons, which Altman later called rushed and renegotiated. The standoff culminated in a Trump Truth Social post threatening civil and criminal consequences against Anthropic, followed by Hegseth's formal designation. The episode marks a significant precedent: the supply-chain risk designation, previously applied only to foreign companies, was used against a U.S. AI lab over its own usage policies.
Dario Amodei Statement on Anthropic's Commitment to American AI Leadership and Policy Alignment
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published a public statement clarifying the company's policy positions and government relationships amid what he describes as inaccurate claims about Anthropic's stances. The statement highlights Anthropic's federal contracts (including a $200M DoD agreement), support for the Trump administration's AI Action Plan, opposition to a 10-year moratorium on state AI laws, and support for California's SB 53 requiring large AI developers to publish safety protocols. Amodei also addresses claims of model political bias, citing a Manhattan Institute study, and reiterates Anthropic's unique policy of restricting AI service sales to PRC-controlled companies.
Anthropic awarded $200M DOD agreement to prototype frontier AI for national security
The U.S. Department of Defense's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) has awarded Anthropic a two-year, $200M ceiling prototype other transaction agreement to develop frontier AI capabilities for national security applications. Work will include fine-tuning models on DOD data, adversarial AI risk mitigation, and responsible AI adoption across the defense enterprise. Anthropic will leverage its Claude Gov models and existing partnerships with Palantir and AWS-hosted infrastructure. This is a significant expansion of Anthropic's federal footprint, building on prior deployments with defense and intelligence agencies.
Anthropic Responds to White House AI Action Plan, Calls for Transparency Standards and Export Controls
Anthropic published a policy response to the White House's 'Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan,' endorsing its focus on AI infrastructure, federal adoption, and safety research while urging additional steps on export controls and mandatory AI development transparency standards. The company highlighted alignment between the plan and its prior OSTP submissions, and noted its proactive activation of ASL-3 protections with Claude Opus 4 as evidence that safety and innovation are compatible. Anthropic called for a single national standard for frontier model transparency rather than a state-by-state patchwork, and encouraged continued investment in NIST's CAISI for evaluating frontier models on national security risks including CBRN capabilities.
Anthropic Strengthens Regional Restrictions to Block China-Controlled Entities
Anthropic is updating its Terms of Service to prohibit access by companies whose ownership structures subject them to control from restricted jurisdictions, including China, regardless of where those companies are incorporated or operate. The new rule targets entities more than 50% owned directly or indirectly by companies headquartered in unsupported regions, closing a loophole where Chinese-controlled firms accessed Anthropic services through foreign subsidiaries. Anthropic cites national security risks including potential data sharing with intelligence services, model distillation for adversarial AI development, and support for authoritarian military objectives. The announcement also reaffirms Anthropic's advocacy for export controls, domestic AI infrastructure buildout, and national-security-focused model evaluations.
Anthropic responds to California Governor Newsom's AI working group draft report
Anthropic published a formal response to the California Governor's Working Group on AI Frontier Models draft report, endorsing its emphasis on transparency and evidence-based policy. Anthropic argues that light-touch mandatory disclosure of safety and security practices would be beneficial without impeding innovation, noting that current voluntary practices are uneven across frontier labs. The response also references Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy and Economic Index as examples of existing transparency efforts, and signals urgency given Anthropic's view that powerful AI systems may arrive as early as end of 2026.