Almanac
← Events
6arXiv cs.CL (Computation and Language)·29d ago

Two is better than one: A Collapse-free Multi-Reward RLIF Training Framework

This paper proposes a multi-reward reinforcement learning from internal feedback (RLIF) framework that decomposes training signals into an answer-level reward via cluster voting and a completion-level reward via token-wise self-certainty. To address reward hacking and entropy collapse common in single-reward RLIF, the authors introduce GDPO-based normalization and KL-Cov regularization targeting low-entropy token distributions. Evaluated on mathematical reasoning and code-generation benchmarks, the method achieves stability and performance approaching supervised RLVR methods without requiring external ground-truth supervision. The work advances scalable unsupervised RL training for LLM reasoning.

Related guides (3)

Related events (8)

6arXiv · cs.CL·2d ago·source ↗

STARE: Token-level advantage reweighting to prevent entropy collapse in GRPO-style RL training

Researchers introduce STARE, a method addressing policy entropy collapse in GRPO-style reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) for LLM post-training. Through first-order gradient analysis, they identify a token-level credit assignment mismatch and propose selectively reweighting advantages for entropy-critical tokens using batch-internal surprisal quantiles plus a closed-loop entropy gate. Evaluated across 1.5B–32B models on short/long chain-of-thought and multi-turn tool use tasks, STARE outperforms DAPO and other baselines by 4–8% on AIME24/25 while sustaining stable training over thousands of steps.

6arXiv · cs.LG·4d ago·source ↗

ExpRL: RL-based mid-training using human QA data as reward scaffolds for LLM reasoning

ExpRL proposes an automated approach to LLM mid-training that replaces manually curated reasoning traces with large corpora of human-written QA data used as reward scaffolds rather than imitation targets. Reference solutions are hidden from the policy and used only to construct problem-specific grading rubrics, enabling dense process-level rewards that reinforce partial progress and intermediate reasoning steps. On challenging math reasoning benchmarks, ExpRL outperforms SFT, sparse-reward GRPO, and self-distillation as an RL initialization strategy, with additional mixed-domain experiments suggesting broader applicability.

6arXiv · cs.AI·16d ago·source ↗

DistIL: Distributional DAgger for RL from Rich Feedback beyond single-bit rewards

A new arXiv preprint introduces DistIL, a distributional variant of the DAgger imitation learning algorithm designed to exploit rich feedback signals (execution traces, tool outputs, expert corrections) rather than the single-bit correctness reward used in standard RLVR. The method uses a forward cross-entropy objective that provides monotonic policy improvement guarantees, unlike reverse KL or Jensen-Shannon divergence objectives used in prior self-distillation approaches. Empirically, DistIL outperforms RLVR and self-distillation baselines on scientific reasoning, coding, and hard math benchmarks.

6arXiv · cs.AI·1mo ago·source ↗

POW3R: Policy-Aware Rubric Rewards for More Efficient RLVR Training

This paper identifies a failure mode in rubric-based reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR): static aggregation of criterion weights conflates human-assigned importance with current optimization utility, causing many criteria to be either already saturated or unreachable. The authors introduce POW3R, a framework that dynamically reweights criterion-level rewards during training using rollout-level contrast to emphasize criteria that currently differentiate policy outputs. Across three base policies and two datasets (multimodal and text-only), POW3R wins 24 of 30 comparisons on rubric reward and strict completion metrics, and reaches equivalent performance in 2.5–4× fewer training steps than vanilla GRPO with rubric rewards.

6arXiv · cs.CL·25d ago·source ↗

Signal Collapse and Reward Hacking in Checker-Guided RAG for Biomedical QA

This paper investigates why NLI-based claim checkers used as process rewards in RL-trained medical RAG agents succeed or fail during training. The authors find that a checker's output distribution during training—not its held-out accuracy—determines whether it provides useful gradient signal, with LLM log-probability scoring causing near-total signal collapse (97%+ neutral labels) while a calibrated MedNLI classifier avoids this. A key finding is that stronger checkers can trigger reward hacking cascades (ultra-short answers, search avoidance, language collapse), while moderate-signal local classifiers yield better final model quality (+12% BERTScore over zero-shot). The work frames these as boundary conditions for verifier-as-reward systems in RLVR pipelines.

6arXiv · cs.CL·19d ago·source ↗

LongTraceRL: Reinforcement Learning for Long-Context Reasoning via Search Agent Trajectories and Rubric Rewards

LongTraceRL is a new RL training framework for improving long-context reasoning in LLMs, addressing limitations of existing RLVR methods. It constructs challenging training data using multi-hop questions from knowledge graph random walks and tiered distractors derived from search agent trajectories (high-confusability: read but uncited; low-confusability: seen but unopened). A rubric reward provides entity-level process supervision along reasoning chains, applied only to correct responses to prevent reward hacking. Experiments across three LLMs (4B–30B parameters) on five long-context benchmarks show consistent improvements over strong baselines.

5arXiv · cs.CL·2d ago·source ↗

Turing-RL: Reinforcement learning with Turing-Test-based rewards for user simulator training

Researchers propose Turing-RL, a method for training LLM-based user simulators using a discriminative reward signal that scores how indistinguishable generated responses are from real user responses, rather than matching a single ground-truth output. An LLM judge evaluates indistinguishability given the user's history, and the simulator is trained via RL to maximize this reward. Evaluated on conversational chat and Reddit forum discussion domains, Turing-RL outperforms log-probability and similarity-reward baselines on both LLM and human evaluation metrics. The work has implications for agent assistant training, personalization system evaluation, and social science research.

6arXiv · cs.AI·19d ago·source ↗

ReuseRL: Skill Reuse as Compression in Agentic RL via MDL Principle

ReuseRL formalizes agentic reinforcement learning through the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle, extracting a shared skill dictionary from successful trajectories and augmenting the RL objective with a segmentation cost that penalizes idiosyncratic, non-reusable behaviors. The authors prove a PAC-Bayes generalization bound for this compression penalty. Evaluated on ALFWorld, TextWorld-Cooking, and Countdown-Stepwise, ReuseRL outperforms vanilla GRPO and round-length baselines on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution tasks.