Systematic evaluation of multi-personality conditioning and dynamic switching in vision-language models
This paper introduces explicit personality conditioning for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and proposes an evaluation framework covering single-personality induction, multi-personality composition, and dynamic personality switching. Experiments reveal that personality induction improves image captioning but degrades performance on precise reasoning tasks like VQA. The authors find balancing and residual effects during multi-trait composition and switching, and show that existing prompt-based personality induction methods transfer poorly to multimodal settings.
Related guides (2)
Related events (8)
Squeezing Capacity from MLLMs for Subject-driven Image Generation via Dual Layer Aggregation
This paper proposes conditioning diffusion models on Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) that jointly encode text and reference images, augmented with VAE-based identity conditioning to address copy-paste artifacts and identity preservation failures in subject-driven image generation. A Dual Layer Aggregation (DLA) module aggregates multi-level MLLM features, and a multi-stage denoising strategy progressively balances semantic and fine-detail identity signals during inference. Experiments show improved human preference scores on subject-driven generation benchmarks compared to prior approaches that encode text and reference images separately.
ETCHR: Decoupled Image Editing for Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in MLLMs
ETCHR introduces a question-conditioned, reasoning-aware image editing model that decouples visual transformation from downstream understanding in multimodal LLMs. It addresses two identified gaps—language-side (mapping abstract questions to visual edits) and generation-side (edit quality degrading with reasoning depth)—via a two-stage training recipe combining supervised fine-tuning on edit trajectories and VLM-derived reward signals. Because the editor is decoupled, it plugs into arbitrary MLLMs without retraining, yielding Pass@1 gains of roughly +4.6 to +5.5 points across five task families when paired with Qwen3-VL-8B, Gemini-3.1-Flash-Lite, and Kimi K2.5. The work advances the 'think with images' paradigm beyond fixed toolkits and unified multimodal approaches.
LoMo: Local Modality Substitution for Deeper Vision-Language Fusion
This paper identifies a 'carrier sensitivity' problem in Vision-Language Models (VLMs), where replacing textual queries with rendered-image equivalents causes significant performance degradation due to asymmetric roles of text and images in training data. The authors propose Local Modality Substitution (LoMo), a data curation paradigm that reformulates single-modality prompts into interleaved multimodal sequences by dynamically rendering text spans as images, enforcing cross-modal representational invariance. Evaluated across 13 multimodal benchmarks, LoMo improves over standard supervised fine-tuning by 2.67 points on LLaVA-OneVision-1.5-8B and 2.82 points on Qwen3.5-9B. The approach is architecture-agnostic and lightweight, requiring no changes to model architecture.
Adversarial robustness and safety alignment in multilingual multimodal LLMs: cross-lingual vulnerability and 'safety-by-failure'
A systematic study evaluates adversarial robustness and safety alignment of multimodal LLMs across 12 languages, finding that adversarial images optimized in one language transfer to others (cross-lingual transferability). The paper introduces the concept of 'safety-by-failure': low-resource languages appear safer not due to genuine alignment but because models fail to comprehend harmful instructions in those languages. Models like Qwen3-VL that integrate multilingual capability throughout training (rather than only at instruction tuning) show genuine cross-lingual safety with active refusal. The findings challenge the assumption that low-resource language safety metrics reflect real alignment.
Mitigating Perceptual Judgment Bias in Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge via Perceptual Perturbation and Reward Modeling
This paper identifies and analyzes 'Perceptual Judgment Bias' in multimodal LLM judges, where models anchor on response text rather than visual evidence when the two conflict. The authors introduce a Perceptually Perturbed Judgment Dataset using counterfactual responses to isolate perceptual errors, and a training framework combining GRPO-based reward modeling with batch-ranking objectives. Experiments on MLLM-as-a-Judge benchmarks show improved perceptual fidelity, ranking coherence, and alignment with human evaluation.
VLMs May Not Globally Enhance Human Alignment over LLMs During Natural Reading
This paper compares matched LLM and VLM pairs in a text-only setting to isolate the effect of multimodal training history on human-like language processing. Using whole-cortex fMRI and eye-tracking data from natural reading, the authors find that multimodal pretraining does not confer a uniform global advantage in human alignment. However, VLMs show selective advantages when sentences contain stronger visual semantic content, with converging evidence from both neural and behavioral measures. The findings suggest language-internal representations remain the primary driver of human text processing alignment.
Real Images, Worse Judgments: Evaluating VLMs on Concreteness and Imagery
This paper evaluates whether vision-language models (VLMs) benefit from real image context when making lexical judgments about word concreteness and imagery. The authors find that real-image contexts frequently hurt alignment with human ratings, especially when visual evidence is least relevant to the word being judged. Probing and canonical correlation analysis reveal that real images cause representational shifts and increased sensitivity to spurious visual cues. Instructing models to focus on text-only content at inference time partially mitigates this degradation.
Vision-OPD: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Fine-Grained Visual Understanding in MLLMs
Vision-OPD addresses a 'regional-to-global perception gap' in multimodal LLMs, where models answer fine-grained visual questions more accurately when given cropped evidence regions than full images. The method instantiates a crop-conditioned teacher and full-image-conditioned student from the same MLLM, minimizing token-level divergence along on-policy rollouts to transfer regional perception to the full-image policy. This self-distillation requires no external teacher models, ground-truth labels, reward verifiers, or inference-time tools. Benchmarks show competitive or superior performance against larger open-source, closed-source, and agentic 'Thinking-with-Images' models.