Researchers present a fully automated pipeline using a multi-agent LLM framework to classify chemical reactions and generate verifiable reaction rules across 665,901 US patent reactions. The system expands a standard taxonomy from 68 to 14,073 classes without human curation, using a verification loop that tests each generated rule against the corpus. A lightweight fingerprint classifier trained on the output achieves 97.7% accuracy on unseen reactions, matching leading proprietary classifiers while extending to novel chemistries. The work demonstrates a general approach for converting generative LLMs into self-expanding symbolic rule systems.
Researchers from MERL propose LLawCo (Learning Laws of Cooperation), a framework that enables embodied LLM-based agents to autonomously align with partners and task objectives in decentralized, partially observable environments. Agents reflect on past failures to extract misaligned behavioral patterns and derive high-level behavioral laws (e.g., 'Talk when necessary', 'Wait for partner'), which are incorporated into reasoning via supervised fine-tuning. The authors also introduce PARTNR-Dialog, a new large-scale multi-agent communicative planning benchmark, and report average success rate improvements of 4.5% on PARTNR-Dialog and 6.8% on TDW-MAT over state-of-the-art open-source communicative agent frameworks across four backbone LLMs.
This paper proposes using LLMs to automate grammar adaptation when metamodels evolve in model-driven engineering, replacing tedious manual work and outperforming rule-based methods. Evaluated on six real-world Xtext DSLs using Claude Sonnet 4.5, ChatGPT 5.1, and Gemini 3, all three LLMs achieved 100% adaptation consistency on test DSLs versus 62-84% for rule-based approaches. A longitudinal study on QVTo showed LLMs successfully reused learned adaptations across all evolution steps without manual editing. However, on large-scale grammars (EAST-ADL, 297 rules), LLM adaptation consistency dropped well below 90%, revealing a scalability limitation.
Researchers present a multi-phase LLM pipeline that autonomously processes 11,083 condensed-matter physics arXiv papers, conceives a research direction, calibrates methodology against published references, runs first-principles computations, and produces a publication-grade manuscript on altermagnetic piezomagnetism. The system operates across 47 fresh-context sessions with 2,162 literature-consultation events, using redundancy and adversarial review for fault tolerance, with human intervention limited to operational knowledge curation at reproduction failures rather than scientific direction. Ablation experiments isolate 'structurally enforced numerical confrontation' at calibration checkpoints as the key mechanism preventing hallucination in physical science domains. The work extends autonomous research agents beyond ML sandboxes into high-stakes physical science, where external literature anchors replace execution-based calibration.
Researchers introduce SupraBench, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate LLMs on supramolecular chemistry tasks including binding affinity prediction, top-binder selection, solvent identification, and host-guest description. The work also releases SupraPMC, a 16M-token corpus of supramolecular chemistry articles from Europe PMC to support domain adaptation. Evaluation of broad open and proprietary LLMs reveals substantial headroom across all tasks, with domain pretraining improving in-distribution regression but creating format compliance tradeoffs. The benchmark targets a narrow but practically important scientific domain where LLM acceleration could reduce days-long dry-lab verification cycles.
Agents-K1 is a new pipeline that converts raw scientific documents into structured knowledge graphs for use by LLM-based research agents, addressing the gap where existing systems reduce papers to abstracts and flat citation edges. The system integrates a multimodal parser, a 4B information-extraction model trained with GRPO, and a tri-source agent interface combining web search, graph retrieval, and cross-document traversal. The authors process 2.46 million scientific papers to produce Scholar-KG, releasing a one-million-paper subset. Experiments show improvements in scientific information extraction, knowledge graph construction, and multi-hop reasoning.
A preprint from arXiv demonstrates that an LLM pipeline can automate reproducibility assessments of published social and behavioral science studies, recovering original effect sizes in 41% of cases (vs. 34% for human reanalysts) and reaching the same qualitative conclusion in 96% of cases (vs. 74% for humans). The study evaluated 76 published studies with predefined claims. The results suggest LLMs could serve as a scalable tool for systematic auditing of empirical research, addressing the resource-intensive nature of traditional reproducibility efforts.
Researchers introduce LLM-as-a-Verifier, a general-purpose verification framework that treats verification as a new scaling axis for LLMs, computing continuous scores from token logit distributions rather than discrete judge outputs. The framework scales along three dimensions—score granularity, repeated evaluation, and criteria decomposition—and achieves state-of-the-art results on Terminal-Bench V2 (86.5%), SWE-Bench Verified (78.2%), RoboRewardBench (87.4%), and MedAgentBench (73.3%) without requiring additional training. The authors also demonstrate that the framework's fine-grained signals can serve as dense RL feedback, improving sample efficiency for SAC and GRPO on robotics and math benchmarks, and build a Claude Code extension for monitoring agentic systems.
A curated GitHub repository collecting over 100 deployable AI agent and RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) applications built with LLMs. The collection is designed for practical use — clone, customize, and ship. With 110,915 total stars and 202 added today, it reflects strong community interest in applied LLM tooling.